Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)US willing to go it alone against Syria if needed [View all]
ABC
Wednesday, August 28, 2013
DEB RIECHMANN AP White House Correspondent
WASHINGTON (AP) - August 28, 2013 (WPVI) -- The Obama administration said Wednesday it would take action against the Syrian government even without the backing of allies or the United Nations because diplomatic paralysis must not prevent a response to the alleged chemical weapons attack outside the Syrian capital last week.
New requests for the United Nations to authorize military action in Syria may have complicated the Obama administration's plan to take retaliatory action on the purported poison gas attack east of Damascus that U.S. officials claim was carried out by President Bashar Assad's forces.
But a State Department spokeswoman said possible U.N. rejection of the U.S. plan - most likely led by Russia - won't slow the administration. "We cannot be held up in responding by Russia's intransigence - continued intransigence - at the United Nations," Marie Harf said. "The situation is so serious that it demands a response."
New requests for the United Nations to authorize military action in Syria may have complicated the Obama administration's plan to take retaliatory action on the purported poison gas attack east of Damascus that U.S. officials claim was carried out by President Bashar Assad's forces.
But a State Department spokeswoman said possible U.N. rejection of the U.S. plan - most likely led by Russia - won't slow the administration. "We cannot be held up in responding by Russia's intransigence - continued intransigence - at the United Nations," Marie Harf said. "The situation is so serious that it demands a response."
http://abclocal.go.com/wpvi/story?section=news/national_world&id=9220375
I don't like the sound of this.
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If action were so blatantly necessary, you'd think other countries would be willing to do
winter is coming
Aug 2013
#1
An entire summer devoted to rhetoric about secrecy and I'm asked to think
HereSince1628
Aug 2013
#13
Is it so hard to see how condescending this is? To act as if punishment is the US' call?
Bonobo
Aug 2013
#16
I agree. But Britain was told they had to wait for the UN this time, thank Dog!
Little Star
Aug 2013
#24
I hate "cowboy diplomacy". The whole idea of having strong international organizations like the UN
pampango
Aug 2013
#23
I certainly hope that the US and every other country can be a force to protect civilians and promote
pampango
Aug 2013
#28
Exactly. We are not the only country that practices "exceptionalism" (Russia's intervention in
pampango
Aug 2013
#32
I always thought it was a cool picture until the comparison to cowboy Bush.
Little Star
Aug 2013
#40
All these other countries are smarter than us, they are keeping their noses out of Syria.
avaistheone1
Aug 2013
#36