Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)BREAKING! - DOJ SURRENDERS ON LEGAL WEED [View all]
Eric Holder Says DOJ Will Let Washington, Colorado Marijuana Laws Go Into Effect
WASHINGTON -- The United States government took a historic step back from its long-running drug war on Thursday, when Attorney General Eric Holder informed the governors of Washington and Colorado that the Department of Justice would allow the states to create a regime that would regulate and implement the ballot initiatives that legalized the use of marijuana for adults. A Justice Department official said that Holder told the governors in a joint phone call early Thursday afternoon that the department would take a "trust but verify approach" to the state laws. DOJ is reserving its right to file a preemption lawsuit at a later date, since the states' regulation of marijuana is illegal under the Controlled Substances Act.
Deputy Attorney General James Cole also issued a three-and-a-half page memo to U.S. attorneys across the country. "The Department's guidance in this memorandum rests on its expectation that states and local governments that have enacted laws authorizing marijuana-related conduct will implement strong and effective regulatory and enforcement systems that will address the threat those state laws could pose to public safety, public health and other law enforcement interests," it reads. "A system adequate to that task must not only contain robust controls and procedures on paper; it must also be effective in practice." The memo also outlines eight priorities for federal prosecutors enforcing marijuana laws. According to the guidance, DOJ will still prosecute individuals or entities to prevent:
the distribution of marijuana to minors;
revenue from the sale of marijuana from going to criminal enterprises, gangs and cartels;
the diversion of marijuana from states where it is legal under state law in some form to other states;
state-authorized marijuana activity from being used as a cover or pretext for the trafficking of other illegal drugs or other illegal activity;
violence and the use of firearms in the cultivation and distribution of marijuana
drugged driving and the exacerbation of other adverse public health consequences associated with marijuana use;
growing of marijuana on public lands and the attendant public safety and environmental dangers posed by marijuana production on public lands;
preventing marijuana possession or use on federal property.
revenue from the sale of marijuana from going to criminal enterprises, gangs and cartels;
the diversion of marijuana from states where it is legal under state law in some form to other states;
state-authorized marijuana activity from being used as a cover or pretext for the trafficking of other illegal drugs or other illegal activity;
violence and the use of firearms in the cultivation and distribution of marijuana
drugged driving and the exacerbation of other adverse public health consequences associated with marijuana use;
growing of marijuana on public lands and the attendant public safety and environmental dangers posed by marijuana production on public lands;
preventing marijuana possession or use on federal property.
The eight high-priority areas leave prosecutors bent on targeting marijuana businesses with a fair amount of leeway, especially the exception for "adverse public health consequences." And prosecutors have shown a willingness to aggressively interpret DOJ guidance in the past, as the many medical marijuana dispensary owners now behind bars can attest. U.S. Attorneys will individually be responsible for interpreting the guidelines and how they apply to a case they intend to prosecute. A Justice Department official said, for example, that a U.S Attorney could go after marijuana distributors who used cartoon characters in their marketing because that could be interpreted as attempting to distribute marijuana to minors.
cont'
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/29/eric-holder-marijuana-washington-colorado-doj_n_3837034.html
156 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This is a small, but very pivotal and important step. FINALLY, some sanity is prevailing.
CaliforniaPeggy
Aug 2013
#3
Do you get the impression they're throwing bones to cut the edge off the criticism about the war?
Baitball Blogger
Aug 2013
#7
I think they got a new dog to distract from NSA. When that didn't work, it became war.
magical thyme
Aug 2013
#21
exactly. they have a bag of bones they can throw us as needed when the heat is on.
magical thyme
Aug 2013
#26
YUP ... after all the screaming about this topic ... this will be a non-event.
JoePhilly
Aug 2013
#44
I get the impression they are throwing in the towel, backing away from the floodgates
bhikkhu
Aug 2013
#117
If he pardons anyone he will pardon Bush and the Iraq War gang. Just sayin. nm
rhett o rick
Aug 2013
#129
I wish you would quit slandering the good people involved in medical marijuana in CA.
Comrade Grumpy
Aug 2013
#146
For some people, it's about making money. But that is the American way.
Comrade Grumpy
Aug 2013
#149
The corruption is not just about making money, it's about making money illegally.
tridim
Aug 2013
#152
You keep saying that shit. Explain BPG. Explain Northstone Organics. Explain MAMM.
Comrade Grumpy
Aug 2013
#155
That is pretty lame. Still, this decision by the DOJ is step in the right direction. nt
ZombieHorde
Aug 2013
#70
Holder gets bashed a lot, and sometimes deservedly so, but I give him kudos on this.
Comrade Grumpy
Aug 2013
#62
NOW can we talk about a blanket amnesty for all weed offenses and lower our prison population?
Spitfire of ATJ
Aug 2013
#72
Mark me cautiously optimistic. I'll wait and see what CA-based federal prosecutors do. n/t
DisgustipatedinCA
Aug 2013
#73
We are not Ron Paul cheerleaders and no we will not shut up until marijuana is legal at the federal
liberal_at_heart
Aug 2013
#123
Now release the thousands of people incarcerated for minor drug offenses and we're getting somewhere
OnlinePoker
Aug 2013
#79
That's excellent news, maybe the beginning of the end of The War on Drugs and associated madness.
MNBrewer
Aug 2013
#80
I've been critical of Holder on this issue, but this is an unequivocally positive step in the right
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2013
#83
I hope every holdout in the DOJ and the DEA contract Small Fiber Sensory Neuropathy and
Dustlawyer
Aug 2013
#84
Any significant restrictions on abortion will run up against Roe v. Wade, which establishes
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2013
#111
"It is fair to ask whether they are more concerned with maintaining public safety...
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2013
#121
No, they didn't just make it illegal for armored cars to transport cash to dispensaries.
tridim
Aug 2013
#134
There is no order, directive or law issued by any federal agency. It doesn't exist.
tridim
Aug 2013
#144
Now what will Holder's excuse be for not going after Legs Dimon or Pretty Boy Lloyd?
Jack Rabbit
Aug 2013
#122
I'm cautiously optimistic. We will have to see how individual US attorneys react to this.
liberal_at_heart
Aug 2013
#124
They'll give y'all the medical marijuana, but in exchnage for it, you'll have to give them another
blkmusclmachine
Aug 2013
#128