Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

80% believe he should get Congressional approval. joshcryer Aug 2013 #1
I agree and it will be more than fascinating to see treestar Aug 2013 #40
That's all that will happen.... No American soldiers will be used. scheming daemons Aug 2013 #2
Who launches missiles from ships? morningfog Aug 2013 #5
Correction... No American soldiers will be in harm's way scheming daemons Aug 2013 #7
No adverse party could reach the ships? morningfog Aug 2013 #9
Answers scheming daemons Aug 2013 #13
As long as Obama can maintain the optics so as morningfog Aug 2013 #19
Your confusing what I think will happen with what I want to happen scheming daemons Aug 2013 #22
Why isn't it a good thing to avoid dead US soldiers? treestar Aug 2013 #41
"Syria's response won't be against US military." Okay, so what is an bullwinkle428 Aug 2013 #26
I don 't hear Israel opposing any attack. nt hack89 Aug 2013 #59
They have Yakhont missiles against ships and TOR M1 against cruise missiles jakeXT Aug 2013 #28
You do realize that modern warships can "see" MADem Aug 2013 #33
Yeah. Tell that to the families of the Sailors who died on cherokeeprogressive Aug 2013 #34
Yes, and how about those that died in the MADem Aug 2013 #36
So the Stark was blind, and US naval vessels no longer make foreign port calls... cherokeeprogressive Aug 2013 #39
They don't refuel in squirrelly places with MADem Aug 2013 #44
Ooh. I can tell you stood a lot of watches in your day. You sound pretty salty. cherokeeprogressive Aug 2013 #49
I really don't think he can "learn you" at all. MADem Aug 2013 #51
That would be SAILORS! MADem Aug 2013 #32
Marking this post Capt. Obvious Aug 2013 #47
Yeah, and the oil will cover the costs, it'll all be over in a couple of weeks.... Paladin Aug 2013 #12
What oil? Syria is not a major oil exporter. MADem Aug 2013 #35
Sorry, I don't buy it. Not anymore. (nt) Paladin Aug 2013 #42
Well, you're welcome to hold whatever opinions please you. MADem Aug 2013 #45
Breaking news: Amerians are bloodthirsty fuckers. The Link Aug 2013 #3
Apparently! Sparky 1 Aug 2013 #55
Desperate spin from that link. Why not use the actual headline? morningfog Aug 2013 #4
Do you ever get dizzy from all the spinning? Democracyinkind Aug 2013 #6
I just don't believe this poll. Most of the US wants us to stay out PERIOD!! nt kelliekat44 Aug 2013 #8
It seems Americans are ok with strikes from ships deutsey Aug 2013 #15
100% of EVERYONE I know say not only NO, but FUCK NO to ANY cherokeeprogressive Aug 2013 #10
I'm not hearing any support for any kind of military action, either deutsey Aug 2013 #16
I have yet to talk to one single person who supports any military action against Syria Douglas Carpenter Aug 2013 #24
That is not even remotely what the headline says. Rex Sep 2013 #63
Another steaming pile. 99Forever Aug 2013 #11
sigh G_j Aug 2013 #14
Misleading, isn't this? WCLinolVir Aug 2013 #17
Wow. Even Fox wouldn't massage an article so much as you have. Scootaloo Aug 2013 #18
Sycophants can be worse than fox. morningfog Aug 2013 #20
Is that what it is? Scootaloo Aug 2013 #21
the actual headline of this article: Poll: Americans want Obama to get Congress OK on Syria Douglas Carpenter Aug 2013 #23
I think the difference is the slant of the news source seabeckind Aug 2013 #25
USA Today played it pretty straight here. BlueCheese Aug 2013 #50
Poll: 80% of Americans say Obama should get Congressional approval before cali Aug 2013 #27
The need to mislead: Actual headline and article very differnt than this mendacity Bluenorthwest Aug 2013 #29
So long as no American has to pay a price n2doc Aug 2013 #30
This attack must have been the one my friend's brother saw happening. IdaBriggs Aug 2013 #31
Richard Engel reported that it was al Assad's brother who did the deed.... MADem Aug 2013 #37
I had been a little confused when Ahmad kept saying "the other day" on Wednesday. IdaBriggs Aug 2013 #46
Targeted strikes shenmue Aug 2013 #38
Iran is a source of manufacture, unfortunately. MADem Aug 2013 #48
I've been hearing all day on NPR that the regime has been busy moving materials to residential areas Tarheel_Dem Aug 2013 #53
A targeted strike wouldn't hit residential areas. MADem Aug 2013 #60
But we know how the regime will spin this, not that they have any credibility... Tarheel_Dem Sep 2013 #61
If only 50% favor cruise missile strikes, that's really low. geek tragedy Aug 2013 #43
And 44% opposing is even lower n/t michigandem58 Sep 2013 #64
K & R Scurrilous Aug 2013 #52
If 99% were for it, and 1% opposed, I'd be a proud "1 percenter." David__77 Aug 2013 #54
Me too! Sparky 1 Aug 2013 #56
I'm surprised that this poster has the quiet complicity of one group here DisgustipatedinCA Aug 2013 #57
Sad to say... I think 50% of Americans would support launching cruise missiles at anywhere devils chaplain Aug 2013 #58
Poll: Americans want Obama to get Congress OK on Syria Rex Sep 2013 #62
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Poll: Americans Favor lau...»Reply #22