Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Civilization2

(649 posts)
115. Because it is the same PNAC crew that is currently pushing for this war,. same as Iraq.
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 08:47 AM
Aug 2013

Obama seems to have little sway or wiggle room over the directives delivered to him from the Corporate-Military, or he simply is on board with them. Either way, the direction is decided by corporate-banksters not the congress or the american people.

he sure did box himself in with the redline comment. neverforget Aug 2013 #1
that move, i think, could only come from pressure from very big interests nashville_brook Aug 2013 #2
He doesn't need to be. If the U.N. found evidence DirkGently Aug 2013 #5
You are right. avaistheone1 Aug 2013 #7
it's almost as if it's not for the good of the country, but rather for the good of a balance sheet. nashville_brook Aug 2013 #99
Because it is the same PNAC crew that is currently pushing for this war,. same as Iraq. Civilization2 Aug 2013 #115
and as Grayson points out, the evidence is actually pointing to conventional weapons nashville_brook Aug 2013 #17
Congress & America are tired of the conceit of the Unitary Executive DirkGently Aug 2013 #30
i don't think Congress wants to have to have this power. nashville_brook Aug 2013 #39
Good. Indecision on this "issue" is better than a decisive DirkGently Aug 2013 #41
yes, i think that's the overriding feeling here. nashville_brook Aug 2013 #44
And that's the problem (we now want the U.N. to stop looking) in a nut shell. Little Star Aug 2013 #56
lack of transparency is becoming quite a theme in this administration. nashville_brook Aug 2013 #58
True and it's really sad. There was so much hope. sigh Little Star Aug 2013 #62
Hope and change have died. lark Aug 2013 #66
Sad but it sure does look that way. I hope I'm wrong. I'd be happy to be wrong. Little Star Aug 2013 #67
I keep hoping I'm wrong as well. lark Aug 2013 #68
i don't believe that he was aware of the pressure that would come from his campaign funders, nashville_brook Aug 2013 #75
is it that noticeable? Supersedeas Aug 2013 #95
He's not boxed in. Any more than he was boxed in when he said, grahamhgreen Aug 2013 #33
good point -- he'll back out of a position when the big dogs howl loudly enough nashville_brook Aug 2013 #49
Ah is that another of those 3 D chess moves? n/t doc03 Aug 2013 #76
I just heard an interview with an ambassador on MSNBC neverforget Aug 2013 #77
Actually, he didn't box himself in as much as republicans would like you to believe. Veilex Aug 2013 #107
Obama has to protect his "Red Line" credibility...by killing people. Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2013 #3
clearly it's the sensible thing to do. nashville_brook Aug 2013 #4
Bravo, Congressman Grayson! K&R. bullwinkle428 Aug 2013 #6
nice to a hear real discussion of the interests involved nashville_brook Aug 2013 #10
DURec leftstreet Aug 2013 #8
K&R! Fantastic Anarchist Aug 2013 #9
Recommended. But you know that's not a real box and it's easy Autumn Aug 2013 #11
indeed -- that's the job of the Commander in Chief, not Raytheon nashville_brook Aug 2013 #12
Options like delivering Cheney to the Hague, if he cares about war crimes. Faryn Balyncd Aug 2013 #14
i think this might be the source of progressive pushback, if he cared about warcrimes nashville_brook Aug 2013 #20
We need a "Dispatches From Under The Bus" Forum Doctor_J Aug 2013 #13
my sense of Grayson is that he's one of the most intelligent House members we've seen in ages nashville_brook Aug 2013 #16
Agreed. n/t Laelth Aug 2013 #55
+1 Trazillion Little Star Aug 2013 #70
Excellent idea!!!! HooptieWagon Aug 2013 #18
a dungeon for bus-tossers. LOVE! nashville_brook Aug 2013 #24
Thank You (again), Congressman Grayson. bvar22 Aug 2013 #15
the smart ones aren't dazzled by PR games nashville_brook Aug 2013 #98
The dumbest yet possibly most human reasons a politician would go to war is HereSince1628 Aug 2013 #19
it's definitely worth hoping that Obama understands this nashville_brook Aug 2013 #22
I agree, the advocacy of people he turned to for advice HereSince1628 Aug 2013 #27
BBC: USA will look inept and weak if they don't bomb... upi402 Aug 2013 #21
the Beeb has been out in front on this...remarkable coverage and analysis. nashville_brook Aug 2013 #23
I'd rather look inept and weak moonlady0623 Aug 2013 #57
ewww! "dead...pumped up with testosterone" nashville_brook Aug 2013 #74
Many more bad images set to be reality moonlady0623 Aug 2013 #86
Thank you Alan Grayson! Scuba Aug 2013 #25
Rookie mistake, or an excuse? truebluegreen Aug 2013 #26
Yes, possibly just an excuse for the mic to do what it wants... polichick Aug 2013 #28
Add this point: the evidence points to an unauthorized launch by a local unit commander. leveymg Aug 2013 #29
yes! the BBC was reporting on this yesterday. holy cow. nashville_brook Aug 2013 #36
I think there is a strong possibility it was a rogue commander davidpdx Aug 2013 #111
the reThugs are hoping he does attack Syria...so they can Impeach him ElsewheresDaughter Aug 2013 #31
maybe not impeach formally, but definitely politically. nashville_brook Aug 2013 #37
Even if the GOP doesn't Impeach, it will divide the Dems going into '14. Like '68. leveymg Aug 2013 #52
eggsactly. nashville_brook Aug 2013 #54
Thnx. ;-) leveymg Aug 2013 #61
Let's hope so ElsewheresDaughter Aug 2013 #63
grounds for Impeachment...Cantor and crybaby are waiting ElsewheresDaughter Aug 2013 #32
not disagreeing...just for information purpose... nashville_brook Aug 2013 #38
heard it on msnbc or faux this morning.....Rollcall has article..... ElsewheresDaughter Aug 2013 #43
that makes perfect sense. this would create a record of who will be vulnerable on the position nashville_brook Aug 2013 #53
I concur n/t ElsewheresDaughter Aug 2013 #59
what's the problem moonlady0623 Aug 2013 #60
It's members of congress. It has nothing to do with 'preteen idol worship' or 'rose colored glasses' stevenleser Aug 2013 #72
Really? moonlady0623 Aug 2013 #87
Yes, really. Did you not understand the post to which you were responding? It's about congress. nt stevenleser Aug 2013 #91
Oh I understand moonlady0623 Aug 2013 #93
All I can think of fredamae Aug 2013 #34
i think this is the worst part of the whole thing: that it undermines our trust. nashville_brook Aug 2013 #35
I believe in Grayson also fredamae Aug 2013 #42
and that's by design -- the Tea Party/Drown Government crowd wants us to have no faith in ourselves nashville_brook Aug 2013 #47
I also trust Grayson. He gives me hope for change when most others don't.... Little Star Aug 2013 #69
Send money railsback Aug 2013 #40
send money to who? nashville_brook Aug 2013 #45
Doh! railsback Aug 2013 #48
^^ so you think Grayson is going out on a limb with this...(wait for it)...to FUNDRAISE? nashville_brook Aug 2013 #50
Well, duh, yeah - check out his fundraising railsback Aug 2013 #81
He can get donations from corporations. They're aren't many corps who are Ds and actually support... Sunlei Aug 2013 #118
For such a reputedly intelligent man, the President seems to have a real learning disability Egalitarian Thug Aug 2013 #46
K&R Thank you. felix_numinous Aug 2013 #51
We need to make a loud noise against war with Syria NOW! WHEN CRABS ROAR Aug 2013 #64
K&R idwiyo Aug 2013 #65
I usually agree with most of what Grayson states, but... DontTreadOnMe Aug 2013 #71
that jumped out at me as particularly ballsy. nashville_brook Aug 2013 #73
But the WH doesn't want to wait for U.N. inspections. DirkGently Aug 2013 #80
"request to extend"... not dismiss them from happening DontTreadOnMe Aug 2013 #83
He can unbox himself by convening Congress and Cleita Aug 2013 #78
Well said. n/t DirkGently Aug 2013 #101
K & R AzDar Aug 2013 #79
"Nobody wants this except for the military industrial complex - ding ding ding ding ding!!!!!!! Initech Aug 2013 #82
yeah man.... fight the good fight.... pass the bong! DontTreadOnMe Aug 2013 #84
Seriously? I was quoting what was in the OP. Initech Aug 2013 #85
yes, I know. I wasn't directing it at you, but that statement... DontTreadOnMe Aug 2013 #88
We are in agreement there! Initech Aug 2013 #90
Whatever we call it -- MIC, PNAC, there are large DirkGently Aug 2013 #92
Suspect the interests of the MIC will win out over the public interest indepat Aug 2013 #89
could be, but we aren't going to roll over and shut up. nashville_brook Aug 2013 #100
How is he boxed in? Spirochete Aug 2013 #94
Obviously that wouldn't be a Grayson message nashville_brook Aug 2013 #97
To the HON. Mr Grayson, BillyRibs Aug 2013 #96
I HATE our politics.... Spitfire of ATJ Aug 2013 #102
Seriously, he is saying the chemical weapons were not used? treestar Aug 2013 #103
listen to the clip -- he's saying the evidence is ambiguous nashville_brook Aug 2013 #113
Fuck the Red Line RiverStone Aug 2013 #104
Grayson FTW yoloisalie Aug 2013 #105
Sniping is easy, making decisions is the hard part....n/t 4bucksagallon Aug 2013 #106
you're suggesting Grayson is "sniping" -- is that what you're calling it? nashville_brook Aug 2013 #112
good advice. I don't think the red line comment was intended to 'guarantee war' . Sunlei Aug 2013 #108
you know, of course, that the US has the largest stockpile of chemical weapons in the world nashville_brook Aug 2013 #114
I don't know about stockpiles and yes, I know the US gov has a longgggg history of extermination. Sunlei Aug 2013 #116
. blkmusclmachine Aug 2013 #109
Republican leadership (oxymoron) The Wizard Aug 2013 #110
good points!I think the republicans elected are used to lobbyists,corp boards,political 'charities', Sunlei Aug 2013 #119
The Powers To Be now are the same as they were under Bush. They transcend presidents. rhett o rick Aug 2013 #117
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Alan Grayson: attacking S...»Reply #115