Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
15. Ah. I asked in a pro-intervention thread...
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 08:27 AM
Aug 2013

what happens when bombs are dropped on chemical weapons (what a sad world we live in). I was looking for info re: dispersement, incineration, neutralization, etc. from the pro-interventionists, but didn't get an answer. Thanks for sharing this article.

Just stumbled upon this...

Experts: Don't Bomb Chemical Weapon Sites in Syria

WASHINGTON August 30, 2013 (AP)
By SETH BORENSTEIN AP Science Writer
Associated Press

You simply can't safely bomb a chemical weapon storehouse into oblivion, experts say. That's why they say the United States is probably targeting something other than Syria's nerve agents.

....

Bombing stockpiles of chemical weapons — purposely or accidentally — would likely kill nearby civilians in an accidental nerve agent release, create a long-lasting environmental catastrophe or both, five experts told The Associated Press. That's because under ideal conditions — and conditions wouldn't be ideal in Syria — explosives would leave at least 20 to 30 percent of the poison in lethal form.

....

When asked if there is any way to ensure complete destruction of the nerve agents without going in with soldiers, seizing the chemicals and burning them in a special processing plant, Ralf Trapp, a French chemical weapons consultant and longtime expert in the field, said simply: "Not really."

....

There is one precedent for bombing a chemical weapons storehouse. In 1991, during the first Persian Gulf War, the U.S. bombed Bunker 13 in Al Muthanna, Iraq. Officials figured it contained 2,500 artillery rockets filled with sarin, the same nerve gas suspected in Syria. More than two decades later the site is so contaminated no one goes near it even now.

....

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/experts-bomb-chemical-weapon-sites-syria-20115062


So Obama wants to bomb to send Assad a strong message. And we may or may not be targeting nerve agents. So that would possibly leave Assad with the nerve agents. What's the message again?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That ought to tell Obama something. Is he too pigheaded to listen? nt kelliekat44 Aug 2013 #1
That's what I was thinking too. Right, wrong, whatever, people are getting tired RKP5637 Aug 2013 #2
It's the rush to take action I don't understand..... Little Star Aug 2013 #3
Yep, same here. Here's an interesting article I just saw, apparently the US has RKP5637 Aug 2013 #4
Interesting. Little Star Aug 2013 #6
I just posted it in GD as an OP. I just found it interesting, maybe they have RKP5637 Aug 2013 #8
. Little Star Aug 2013 #14
Ah. I asked in a pro-intervention thread... WorseBeforeBetter Aug 2013 #15
That's what I've been wondering deutsey Aug 2013 #10
No President has ever given up powers as Commander in Chief. joshcryer Aug 2013 #9
Thanks for the additional info. n/t RKP5637 Aug 2013 #11
That maybe his only way out davidpdx Aug 2013 #18
Glad to hear it. (nt) Paladin Aug 2013 #5
So British Colonialism is finally over? joshcryer Aug 2013 #7
that was my first thought. Actually, my first thought was... Javaman Aug 2013 #12
Heh, it was definitely tongue in cheek. joshcryer Aug 2013 #13
Regardless of how I feel about the situation is Syria davidpdx Aug 2013 #16
actually kind of cool factoid. THANKS KittyWampus Aug 2013 #17
Good, better late than never. n/t Jefferson23 Aug 2013 #19
In a parliamentary system treestar Aug 2013 #20
Wow that's amazing but not really when you think about the line of crap gopiscrap Aug 2013 #21
Glad to hear it. avaistheone1 Aug 2013 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»David Cameron becomes 1st...»Reply #15