Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Ghost Dog

(16,881 posts)
3. Yes indeed. But you this refers to a relatively brief period of recent history
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 11:02 AM
Aug 2013

compared to:

Ottoman Empire–Persian Empire relations
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The history of Persian-Ottoman relations started with the establishment of Safavid dynasty in the Persian Empire in the early 16th century. The initial Ottoman-Safavid conflict culminated in the Battle of Chaldiran in 1514, and was followed by a century of border confrontation. In 1639, Safavid Iran and Ottoman Empire signed the Treaty of Zuhab which recognized Iraq in Ottoman control.

Until the 18th century, the struggle between Safavid Persian Shi'ism and the Ottoman version of Islamic orthodoxy had continued to remain an important dimension of the combative relationships between the two empires.[1] In the early 18th century, Persian-Ottoman peace negotiations introduced a new concept of inter-Muslim relations whereby sovereign states could co-exist as autonomous parts of the Islamic world community.[2] Although the further relations were guided by the mutual fear of weakness and distrust, it wasn't until 1847 when Qajar Iran and Ottoman Empire reached a substantial peace Treaty of Erzurum, starting a century of peace.[1]

/... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottoman_Empire%E2%80%93Persian_Empire_relations


See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottoman%E2%80%93Persian_Wars

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This indeed appears to be what the US Gov intends... Ghost Dog Aug 2013 #1
Nixon, Dulles & Dulles, on behalf of British Petroleum, helped set the stage for World War III. Octafish Aug 2013 #2
Yes indeed. But you this refers to a relatively brief period of recent history Ghost Dog Aug 2013 #3
Clash of Civilizations Octafish Aug 2013 #6
Follow the oil. K&R. bullwinkle428 Aug 2013 #4
The Oil Kings Octafish Aug 2013 #9
Cribbed from far-right "American Thinker" jberryhill Aug 2013 #5
Are you accusing Robert Fisk of plagiarism? Octafish Aug 2013 #8
Where do they come in? jberryhill Aug 2013 #10
Cribbed is a synonym for plagiarism Octafish Aug 2013 #14
Evaluate the idea, instead of attacking the source. Maedhros Aug 2013 #20
PNAC list down to just two... woo me with science Aug 2013 #7
Damascus is a stepping stone to Tehran Octafish Aug 2013 #13
of course it is .. even tho iamthebandfanman Aug 2013 #11
My attention span must be PNAC short. Octafish Aug 2013 #15
I can see Assad "surviving" meaning he stays alive, 7962 Aug 2013 #24
Iran is a serious threat leftstreet Aug 2013 #12
Can't post that often enough. woo me with science Aug 2013 #16
Sheezo-peet! They've got us exactly where they want us! Octafish Aug 2013 #18
Oy yes! Maedhros Aug 2013 #21
It might be possible to drive a diplomatic wedge between Iran and Syria KamaAina Aug 2013 #17
It's just business. Octafish Aug 2013 #25
wait for '15, ya hair-on-fire Psychlos! MisterP Aug 2013 #19
Will there be immunity in the future? Octafish Aug 2013 #27
Thank you, Octafish, for your many informative posts. JEB Aug 2013 #22
You are most welcome, JEB! Thank you for your kind words. Octafish Aug 2013 #26
If ''The West'' = ''Israel'' -- Then yes, Iran is the real target. DeSwiss Aug 2013 #23
Absolutely enough. Had to peel Ray McGovern out from under the bus... Octafish Aug 2013 #29
So bombing Syria could be a shot across the bow of Iran? liberal N proud Aug 2013 #28
In part. Octafish Aug 2013 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Iran, Not Syria, Is the W...»Reply #3