Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
13. Damascus is a stepping stone to Tehran
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 11:59 AM
Aug 2013


http://www.arabamericannews.com/newsarticle.php?article...

They wouldn't really attack Iran, would they?
By: Paul Street
2007-08-11

Remember the old neoconservative half-joke that "sacking Baghdad is fine but real men go to Tehran?" We are moving into the time when many Washington watchers have thought it possible and even likely that George W. Bush and Dick Cheney would order an attack on Iran .

They wouldn't really do it, would they?

God knows there are a large number of reasons for a rational White House NOT to attack. United States and global public opinion is opposed to a U.S. assault on Iran. So are European and other leading and allied governments, the U.S. intelligence community and much of the nation's military leadership. According to a February 25th "London Times" report, "most senior commanders are prepared to resign if the White House orders a strike against Iran."

SNIP...

While "Iran cannot (militarily) defend itself against U.S. attack," Noam Chomsky recently noted, "it can respond in other ways, among them by inciting ever more havoc in Iraq. "Some issue warnings that are more grave," Chomsky adds, noting British military historian Corelli Barnett's judgment that "an attack on Iran would effectively launch World War Tthree" (5).

SNIP...

A military strike against Iran would be thoroughly illegal under international law and the U.S. Constitution. It would evoke horror and condemnation across the world, further tarnishing the United States' fading "moral credentials" (Bzrezinski), especially if it employs (as it likely would) "low yield" nuclear missiles that would (as a senior U.S. intelligence official told Seymour Hersh) produce "mushroom clouds, radiation, mass casualties and contamination over years&quot 7).

CONTINUED at Waybac Machine:

http://web.archive.org/web/20070505135012/http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=67&ItemID=12610



Too bad the streets are paved with the bones of innocents...

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This indeed appears to be what the US Gov intends... Ghost Dog Aug 2013 #1
Nixon, Dulles & Dulles, on behalf of British Petroleum, helped set the stage for World War III. Octafish Aug 2013 #2
Yes indeed. But you this refers to a relatively brief period of recent history Ghost Dog Aug 2013 #3
Clash of Civilizations Octafish Aug 2013 #6
Follow the oil. K&R. bullwinkle428 Aug 2013 #4
The Oil Kings Octafish Aug 2013 #9
Cribbed from far-right "American Thinker" jberryhill Aug 2013 #5
Are you accusing Robert Fisk of plagiarism? Octafish Aug 2013 #8
Where do they come in? jberryhill Aug 2013 #10
Cribbed is a synonym for plagiarism Octafish Aug 2013 #14
Evaluate the idea, instead of attacking the source. Maedhros Aug 2013 #20
PNAC list down to just two... woo me with science Aug 2013 #7
Damascus is a stepping stone to Tehran Octafish Aug 2013 #13
of course it is .. even tho iamthebandfanman Aug 2013 #11
My attention span must be PNAC short. Octafish Aug 2013 #15
I can see Assad "surviving" meaning he stays alive, 7962 Aug 2013 #24
Iran is a serious threat leftstreet Aug 2013 #12
Can't post that often enough. woo me with science Aug 2013 #16
Sheezo-peet! They've got us exactly where they want us! Octafish Aug 2013 #18
Oy yes! Maedhros Aug 2013 #21
It might be possible to drive a diplomatic wedge between Iran and Syria KamaAina Aug 2013 #17
It's just business. Octafish Aug 2013 #25
wait for '15, ya hair-on-fire Psychlos! MisterP Aug 2013 #19
Will there be immunity in the future? Octafish Aug 2013 #27
Thank you, Octafish, for your many informative posts. JEB Aug 2013 #22
You are most welcome, JEB! Thank you for your kind words. Octafish Aug 2013 #26
If ''The West'' = ''Israel'' -- Then yes, Iran is the real target. DeSwiss Aug 2013 #23
Absolutely enough. Had to peel Ray McGovern out from under the bus... Octafish Aug 2013 #29
So bombing Syria could be a shot across the bow of Iran? liberal N proud Aug 2013 #28
In part. Octafish Aug 2013 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Iran, Not Syria, Is the W...»Reply #13