Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Over 50 House Democrats oppose "unwise war... without adhering to constitutional requirements." [View all]bvar22
(39,909 posts)48. DURec for Barbara Lee!!!
"'Traitor', 'coward', 'communist.' Choose the name, I've been called it in the last few weeks," says Representative Barbara Lee, Democrat of California. "Some of it has been very harsh, very harsh."
The Congresswoman's voice trails off. Along with the name-calling came threats on her life. She moves around Washington these days shadowed by a plainclothes police officer who has been assigned to serve as a 'round-the-clock bodyguard.
What did Lee do to earn such threats?
On September 14, she voted against the House bill that granted President Bush broad authority to use force to counter the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. She was the sole member of Congress to do so. "I am convinced," she said on the House floor, "that military action will not prevent further acts of international terrorism against the United States."
In the face of polls suggesting that close to 90 percent of Americans favored some use of force in response to the attacks, Lee's dissent was risky. "Obviously, this was not a poll-driven decision," she jokes.
Lee objected to several aspects of the resolution. "It did not identify who we were to be fighting," she says. "It did not contain an end strategy. The bottom line is to save lives and to make the world a more peaceful place. We can't do that by moving in a direction that will create a cycle of violence. As a nation, we've got to understand the implications of what we are doing."
She also objected to Congress abdicating its constitutional role.
"Congress," she argues, "has a responsibility to step back and say, 'Let's not rush to judgment.' Let us insist that our democracy works by ensuring the checks and balances are in place and that Congress is part of the decision making process in terms of when we go to war and with whom. This resolution really took away that ability of Congress to play a role, and I don't think that's a good thing. I think we disenfranchised the American people."
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Political_Reform/Lone_Dissenter_BLee.html
The Congresswoman's voice trails off. Along with the name-calling came threats on her life. She moves around Washington these days shadowed by a plainclothes police officer who has been assigned to serve as a 'round-the-clock bodyguard.
What did Lee do to earn such threats?
On September 14, she voted against the House bill that granted President Bush broad authority to use force to counter the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. She was the sole member of Congress to do so. "I am convinced," she said on the House floor, "that military action will not prevent further acts of international terrorism against the United States."
In the face of polls suggesting that close to 90 percent of Americans favored some use of force in response to the attacks, Lee's dissent was risky. "Obviously, this was not a poll-driven decision," she jokes.
Lee objected to several aspects of the resolution. "It did not identify who we were to be fighting," she says. "It did not contain an end strategy. The bottom line is to save lives and to make the world a more peaceful place. We can't do that by moving in a direction that will create a cycle of violence. As a nation, we've got to understand the implications of what we are doing."
She also objected to Congress abdicating its constitutional role.
"Congress," she argues, "has a responsibility to step back and say, 'Let's not rush to judgment.' Let us insist that our democracy works by ensuring the checks and balances are in place and that Congress is part of the decision making process in terms of when we go to war and with whom. This resolution really took away that ability of Congress to play a role, and I don't think that's a good thing. I think we disenfranchised the American people."
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Political_Reform/Lone_Dissenter_BLee.html
A GREAT Democrat & Patriot.
We need more leaders like Barbara Lee.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Over 50 House Democrats oppose "unwise war... without adhering to constitutional requirements." [View all]
Faryn Balyncd
Aug 2013
OP
Yup, do it the right way. I hope nothing happens despite the lurid reporting. IDK who to believe.
freshwest
Aug 2013
#13
Let me know what happens when they come to congress for more money for this shit.
L0oniX
Aug 2013
#17
Misleading headline & lead should be preserved in annals of bad journalism (nt)
philly_bob
Aug 2013
#19
Every Democratic Representative is not a signer needs to have their telephone ring off the wall.
Faryn Balyncd
Aug 2013
#32
Maybe they will get a few more supporters and save the President from his "red line"?
kentuck
Aug 2013
#44
Congress has abdicated their right to declare war which I believe is unconstitutional but wont be
rhett o rick
Aug 2013
#45
This is important backstory which I previously missed. My congressman signed both letters.
proverbialwisdom
Sep 2013
#58