Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CrispyQ

(40,940 posts)
27. "The Corporation" should be required viewing.
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 05:29 PM
Aug 2013

An excellent movie. It's available at Netflix. Watch it. Encourage everyone you know to watch it. Corporations are the most powerful entity right now. They are an artificial construct for the rich & powerful to behave without consequence, or very little consequence. We have the power to rein them in, or we did. Our electoral process has been so corrupted & compromised, I doubt it can happen via that route.

The statements that Ray Anderson said in the movie, are very moving. If only there were more CEOs like him. The first is the one that really hit me, but everything he said was so spot on. (Anderson was the CEO of a carpet manufacturing company.)

Rest in peace, Mr. Anderson. Your words made an impact on at least one person.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0379225/quotes

Ray Anderson: For 21 years I never gave a thought to what we were taking from the Earth or doing to the Earth in the making of our products. And then in the summer of 1994 we began to hear questions from our customers we had never heard before: 'What's your Company doing for the Environment?' And we didn't have answers. The real answer was not very much. And it really disturbed many of our people, not me so much as them, and a group in our research department decided to convene a taskforce and bring people from our businesses around the world to come together to assess our company's worldwide environment position to begin to frame answers for those customers. They asked me if I would come and speak to that group and give them a kick-off speech and launch this new task force with an environmental vision, and I didn't have an environmental position, and I did not want to make that speech. And sort of the propitious moment, this book landed on my desk. It was Paul Hawkins' book, The Ecology of Commerce and I began to read The Ecology of Commerce, really desperate for inspiration, and very quickly into that book I found the phrase, "The Death of Birth". It was E.O. Wilson's expression for species extinction, "The Death of Birth," and it was a point of a spear into my chest, and I read on, and the spear went deeper, and it became an epiphanal experience, a total change of mindset for myself and a change of paradigm. Can any product be made sustainably? Well, not any and every product. Can you make landmines sustainably? Well, I don't think so. There's a more fundamental question than that about landmines. Some products ought not to be made at all. Unless we can make carpets sustainably, you know, perhaps we don't have a place in a sustainable world, but neither does anybody else, making products unsustainably. One day early in this journey it dawned on me that the way I'd been running Interface is the way of the plunderer; plundering something that's not mine, something that belongs to every creature on earth. And I said to myself, "my goodness, the day must come when this is illegal, when plundering is not allowed. It must come". So, I said to myself, "my goodness, some day people like me will end up in jail".


Ray Anderson: Running a business is a tough proposition. There are costs to be minimised a every turn, and at some point the corporation says, you know, let somebody else deal with that. Let's let somebody else supply the military power to the Middle East to protect the oil at its source. Let's let somebody else build the roads that we can drive these automobiles on. Let's let somebody else have these problems. And that is where externalities come from, that notion of let somebody else deal with that. I got all I can handle myself.

Ray Anderson: Drawing the metaphor of the early attempts to fly. The man going off of a very high cliff in his airplane, with the wings flapping, and the guys flapping the wings and the wind is in his face, and this poor fool thinks he's flying, but, in fact, he's in free fall, and he just doesn't know it yet because the ground is so far away, but, of course, the craft is doomed to crash. That's the way our civilization is, the very high cliff represents the virtually unlimited resources we seem to have when we began this journey. The craft isn't flying because it's not built according to the laws of aerodynamics and it's subject to the law of gravity. Our civilization is not flying because it's not built according to the laws of aerodynamics for civilizations that would fly. And, of course, the ground is still a long way away, but some people have seen that ground rushing up sooner than the rest of us have. The visionaries have seen it and have told us it's coming. There's not a single scientific, peer-reviewed paper published in the last 25 years that would contradict this scenario: every living system of earth is in decline, every life support system of earth is in decline, and these together constitute the biosphere, the biosphere that supports and nurtures all of life, and not just our life but perhaps 30 million other species that share this planet with us. The typical company of the 20th century: extractive, wasteful, abusive, linear in all of its processes, taking from the earth, making, wasting, sending its products back to the biosphere, waste to a landfill. I, myself, was amazed to learn just how much stuff the earth has to produce through our extraction process to produce a dollar of revenue for our company. When I learned, I was flabbergasted. We are leaving a terrible legacy of poison and diminishment of the environment for our grandchildren's grandchildren, generations not yet born. Some people have called that intergeneration tyranny, a form of taxation without representation, levied by us on generations yet to be. It's the wrong thing to do.

Ray Anderson: (Speech to Civic and Business Leaders, North Carolina State U) Do I know you well enough to call you fellow plunderers? There is not an industrial company on earth, not an institution of any kind, not mine, not yours, not anyone's that is sustainable. I stand convicted by me, myself alone, not by anyone else, as a plunderer of the earth, but not by our civilisation's definition. By our civilisation's definition, I'm a captain of industry. In the eyes of many a kind of modern day hero. But really, really, the first industrial revolution is flawed, it is not working. It is unsustainable. It is the mistake and we must move on to another and better industrial revolution and get it right this time.

Ray Anderson: When I think of what could be I visualise an organisation of people committed to a purpose and the purpose is doing no harm. I see a company that has severed the umbilical cord to earth for its raw materials, taking raw materials that have already been extracted and using them over and over again, driving that process with renewable energy. It is our plan, it remains our plan to climb Mount Sustainability, that mountain that is higher than Everest, infinitely higher than Everest, far more difficult to scale. That point at the top symbolising zero footprint...
Title Card: Since 1995, Interface has reduced its ecological footprint by one third. Its stated goal is to be sustainable by 2020.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Because a Republican could never pull it off leftstreet Aug 2013 #1
THE real answer, I'm afraid. FiveGoodMen Aug 2013 #28
Unfortunately, you've hit the nail on its head. n/t TheBlackAdder Aug 2013 #32
The Powers In Charge knew that they needed a Democrat in the WH to rhett o rick Aug 2013 #37
I'm not convinced of that. Remember when their henchman Rove threw a huge hissy fit last year? AverageJoe90 Aug 2013 #40
Yes and I agree. They were only going to give Obama 4 years. Point taken. nm rhett o rick Aug 2013 #41
But who are "they"? freedom fighter jh Aug 2013 #51
"They" controlled both candidates so they were not worried. "They" also control most Dustlawyer Aug 2013 #57
"maybe the people who really run things didn't want a Romney win." I'm sorry. But No. Just no. AverageJoe90 Aug 2013 #65
You need a chill pill. freedom fighter jh Aug 2013 #67
Rove is just a workhorse. He is not even liked by Bush Sr. 'They' are way above the likes sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #70
I disagree about the begging for another Bush. cui bono Aug 2013 #43
I dont disagree. What I said was TPTB figured after Obama, the country would accept a Republican in rhett o rick Aug 2013 #48
heh SammyWinstonJack Aug 2013 #49
What we will find is that the one that wins will appoint (?) the same intelligence leaders, the rhett o rick Aug 2013 #62
True. Makes no real difference anymore. n/t cui bono Aug 2013 #61
"I think they needed a Dem" No, they didn't. AverageJoe90 Aug 2013 #66
Don't agree. That's the theater they want you to see. cui bono Aug 2013 #68
So what if both parties have problems? I don't deny THAT, not at all. AverageJoe90 Sep 2013 #69
True. They did actively try to steal 2012. Perhaps there's 2 levels of "they". cui bono Sep 2013 #75
the real tragedy is that Obama has taken traditional Dem issues away. grasswire Sep 2013 #77
Exactly. Since the Dems are now proposing these things cui bono Sep 2013 #78
First response to the OP nails it. nt NorthCarolina Aug 2013 #45
*authored by Hillary. bunnies Aug 2013 #2
She certainly did help draft this POS OhioChick Aug 2013 #3
Her hubby must be proud. bunnies Aug 2013 #5
I agree OhioChick Aug 2013 #6
Yep. bunnies Aug 2013 #8
It looks like launching disastrous treaties for American workers run in the Clinton family blood. avaistheone1 Aug 2013 #13
Imagine what she'd do as President. bunnies Aug 2013 #19
This seriously adds to my growing list of reservations about Hillary. avaistheone1 Aug 2013 #20
Thats what makes it so infuriating. bunnies Aug 2013 #21
Her hubby Plucketeer Aug 2013 #50
This is only one reason why I will not vote for her. glinda Aug 2013 #11
Same here n/t OhioChick Aug 2013 #16
Same here. No way will I vote for Hillary...her time has come and gone. Raksha Sep 2013 #74
+1000 nt antigop Aug 2013 #31
If enough of us make enough noise about this, she may lose her bullwinkle428 Aug 2013 #14
Yep. bunnies Aug 2013 #18
Good idea. CrispyQ Aug 2013 #25
+ 1 Berlum Aug 2013 #29
Just hope that Amy BlueDog Klobuchar doesn't get chosen. Worse even. glinda Aug 2013 #35
I wish that were possible. We are a small minority. There are lots of DU'ers that will rhett o rick Aug 2013 #42
I did not know that. CrispyQ Aug 2013 #24
This is the biggest betrayal. LiberalAndProud Aug 2013 #4
At one point, I actually believed they were serious. Now, Congress Inside Trades on a Daily Basis. TheBlackAdder Aug 2013 #58
Exactly. Getting TPP passed is multi-national Corps #1 priority. HooptieWagon Aug 2013 #7
Huge K&R. Thank you for keeping this on the front page. woo me with science Aug 2013 #9
Needs to stay on the first page a bit. mick063 Aug 2013 #10
This Is A Big Deal colsohlibgal Aug 2013 #12
Rachel is stuck in "LBGT rights" mode. mick063 Aug 2013 #17
I think you're right. caseymoz Aug 2013 #23
Next time, let's vet our candidates for high office a bit first, okay??? blkmusclmachine Aug 2013 #15
I call it Post-Marxist Liberalism. caseymoz Aug 2013 #22
We don't necessarily need to embrace Marxism - simply the concept of truedelphi Aug 2013 #33
Have you read Marx? caseymoz Aug 2013 #53
+1 leftstreet Aug 2013 #59
You are making some good points. None of which truedelphi Aug 2013 #63
It is alarming,isn't it? LiberalAndProud Aug 2013 #26
"The Corporation" should be required viewing. CrispyQ Aug 2013 #27
I second your idea of watching this film. truedelphi Aug 2013 #34
This shouldn't surprise anyone who has been paying attention. nt TBF Aug 2013 #30
well r & k then. n/t wildbilln864 Aug 2013 #36
Recommend jsr Aug 2013 #38
The same reason he is trying to abolish public ed through his flak Arne Duncan. duffyduff Aug 2013 #39
Abolish??? No, Strengthen. jsr Aug 2013 #46
kick woo me with science Aug 2013 #44
Disgusting, but not surprising MissDeeds Aug 2013 #47
Very astute observation jsr Aug 2013 #56
He's Buy-Partisan Octafish Aug 2013 #52
K&R MotherPetrie Aug 2013 #54
I'll tell you why he's supporting TPP Ocelot Aug 2013 #55
What the hell goes on behind the scenes? Kablooie Aug 2013 #60
Signed. This is such a fucking travesty. Betrayals don't come forestpath Aug 2013 #64
NAFTA was started by GHWB... finished by Clinton markiv Sep 2013 #71
100th rec. n/t Egalitarian Thug Sep 2013 #72
NOTHING Obama has done, has surprised me markiv Sep 2013 #73
So we can sell corn and soybeans overseas Recursion Sep 2013 #76
Thanks for the link. I made good use of it. nt Jasana Sep 2013 #79
I'm assuming this is a rhetorical question. DeSwiss Sep 2013 #80
Anything to weaken US labor and make huge profits for the ruling class. B Calm Sep 2013 #81
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pres. Obama: Why are you ...»Reply #27