Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)"You've got to be kidding me" [View all]
Posted with permission.
http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2013/08/30/20262049-those-who-still-get-the-iraq-wmd-story-wrong?lite
Those who still get the Iraq WMD story wrong
By Steve Benen
-
Fri Aug 30, 2013 3:37 PM EDT
It was a little jarring to hear Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) insist that Saddam Hussein "had weapons of mass destruction," and may have moved the stockpiles "over into Syria." I immediately double-checked the date, and sure enough, the comments came yesterday.
To clarify, those making remarks like these in August 2003 were foolish. For anyone, least of all an elected member of Congress, to repeat such things out loud in August 2013 suggests Louie Gohmert may, in fact, be made of wood.
Alas, he's not alone.
Rep. Lee Terry (R-Neb.) said on Thursday that he is against military intervention in Syria, even though his "gut feeling" is that the Syrian government now possesses chemical weapons that came from fallen Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein.
Terry, who has served in the House since 1999, supported the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003. In an interview on Thursday with Omaha radio host Tom Becka, Terry said Syria was a completely different situation.
"The theory then and the evidence was that Iraq was an enemy of the United States and had direct plans in either support of al Qaeda and/or with other weapons that we found out weren't there -- which I still think they were moved to Syria," said Terry. "And it wouldn't surprise me if some of the chemical weapons that have been used by Syria actually came from Iraq."
Terry, who has served in the House since 1999, supported the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003. In an interview on Thursday with Omaha radio host Tom Becka, Terry said Syria was a completely different situation.
"The theory then and the evidence was that Iraq was an enemy of the United States and had direct plans in either support of al Qaeda and/or with other weapons that we found out weren't there -- which I still think they were moved to Syria," said Terry. "And it wouldn't surprise me if some of the chemical weapons that have been used by Syria actually came from Iraq."
The Nebraska Republican added, "{W}e all we know that Iraq had ... chemical and biological weapons and then they weren't there."
You've got to be kidding me.
It's painful to realize that there are still members of Congress who are confused about the basics, even now, a decade later.
But in case Reps. Terry and Gohmert see this, let's spell it out: Iraq's WMD stockpiles didn't exist. There's no reason to believe the weapons were moved to Syria since, once again, they didn't exist.
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
These are the same weapons we were also told at that same time were loaded in a ship. . .
Journeyman
Aug 2013
#3
Rep. Louie Gohmert and Rep. Lee Terry have the intelligence and foresight of a >>
BlueJazz
Aug 2013
#6
Sounds like a happy thing. I've started watching "The Sopranos" ....never seen the program before...
BlueJazz
Aug 2013
#29
RWReligionists have claimed for years that Saddam's WMD were buried in the plains north of Israel.
freshwest
Aug 2013
#9
I don't think the shelf-life/half-life of most chemical weapons could last beyond a decade max
shotten99
Aug 2013
#23
louie is living proof that moronic imbeciles can and do get elected to congress
spanone
Aug 2013
#30