Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Friday News Dump? U.S. Had Intel on Chemical Strike Before It Was Launched [View all]pnwmom
(110,254 posts)64. Why should it be fascinating to you that I used the exact term that the posted article used?
Is it fascinating to you that someone would actually read the posted article? Instead of jumping to an incorrect conclusion, as it is likely the OP did?
"In the three days prior to the attack, we collected streams of human, signals and geospatial intelligence that reveal regime activities that we assess were associated with preparations for a chemical weapons attack," said a U.S. intelligence report the Obama administration released Friday.
"Multiple streams of intelligence indicate that the regime executed a rocket and artillery attack against the Damascus suburbs in the early hours of August 21," the report added. Satellites detected that the weapons were launched from territories held by the regime."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
126 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Friday News Dump? U.S. Had Intel on Chemical Strike Before It Was Launched [View all]
kpete
Aug 2013
OP
any experts (incl President Carter) thinks Obama will break the law with the strikes afterwards too
DJ13
Aug 2013
#8
And how many people would be alive and in their own homes today if America HAD NOT...
TheMadMonk
Aug 2013
#102
I just read a post here that sounded like the rebels bobbytrapped the neighborhoods
notadmblnd
Aug 2013
#34
Damned if he does, damned if he doesn't. This black president can't do anything right.
NYC_SKP
Aug 2013
#7
DU members excepted, I think it's true that he takes more heat than a white guy would.
NYC_SKP
Aug 2013
#110
Yes, the chemicals would be dispersed resulting in more deaths from chemical warfare
notadmblnd
Aug 2013
#125
Is there some evidence that the US knew this wouldn't be one of the "usual" smaller-scale
pnwmom
Aug 2013
#24
I don't think it raises disturbing questions at all. Particularly when you see how
stevenleser
Aug 2013
#25
With what info? That some activity appeared like Syria might use Chemical weapons?
stevenleser
Aug 2013
#39
See #40 below for another important point. The data may have come in but it was not analyzed
stevenleser
Aug 2013
#75
Why should it be fascinating to you that I used the exact term that the posted article used?
pnwmom
Aug 2013
#64
please don't be harshing in kpete, she posts lots of stuff. This is interesting. And Foreign Policy
KittyWampus
Aug 2013
#36
The word "collected" is in the past tense. The words "reveal" and "assess" are in the present tense.
pnwmom
Aug 2013
#74
Nowhere in the article does it say that the US had analyzed this info days before the attack.
pnwmom
Aug 2013
#49
You do understand that the US doesn't have the intelligence staff with the requisite
pnwmom
Aug 2013
#61
Gee, it seems odd that our language staff would still be at 9-11 levels after years to correct that.
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2013
#85
From reading this week it sure sounds like we do NOT HAVE enough Arabic translators & Israel does
KittyWampus
Aug 2013
#99