Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What if Assad ordered conventional strikes and that ignited Rebel Chemical Weapons [View all]Historic NY
(39,828 posts)21. Ask why would Assad attack a NATO country Turkey with rockets too....
knowing it would provoke a responce......eventually. There is a lots of things that don't apparently make much sense, other than trying to widen the conflict with more participants for one side or the other.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What if Assad ordered conventional strikes and that ignited Rebel Chemical Weapons [View all]
dkf
Aug 2013
OP
How would you account for the jet fighters' napalm-like dump on the playground? nt
pnwmom
Aug 2013
#5
I give up. Reread my post, and then read the stuff at the link. Or not. Your choice. n/t
Benton D Struckcheon
Aug 2013
#39
It's a moot point. The death toll from US strikes will rival the toll from the chem strike.
Cooley Hurd
Aug 2013
#12
If you're talking about the articles from the examiner.com and the mintpressnews ...
Tx4obama
Aug 2013
#41
The attack with the napalm type chemical that BURNT folks was dropped from a FIGHTER JET
Tx4obama
Aug 2013
#18
The premise of the OP was that the napalm type chemicals set off the chemical weapons...
Cooley Hurd
Aug 2013
#26
No. Two different events in two different places. One couldn't have set off the other. n/t
Tx4obama
Aug 2013
#28
Yes, by US in Falluja. You are absolutely correct. According to US it's not a banned chemical weapon
idwiyo
Aug 2013
#31
Because all of those kids and people that got burnt all over their bodies are just as important. n/t
Tx4obama
Aug 2013
#43
