Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
5. Obama says no, for what his word is worth.
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 10:49 PM
Aug 2013

Which makes a missle strike a futile gesture. It will not affect Assad's ability to fight the rebels. It will not damage any military infrastructure the Russians can't replace in a few days. It will not eliminate chemical weapons or prevent their future use. In short, there is no military strategic or tactical purpose to be accomplished by a missle strike alone. It is merely a face-saving political statement, one that will result in civilian deaths and likely escalate the war and extend it outside Syria's borders.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Are we invading Syria lik...»Reply #5