Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
4. Depends on the targets hit
Sat Aug 31, 2013, 07:44 AM
Aug 2013

Radars/anti-aircraft defenses/etc won't impact assad's ability to fight the various factions since those assets are not being used in that fight.

And if nothing else this would open up Syrian airspace for easier air strikes against al-qaida members there from the US should they so choose to do so (like in Yemen and Pakistan, not at war with either but we just struck in Pakistan again today).

If the US has a broader plan (who knows) remove assad's air defenses, strike the rebels, remove assad, stabilize the country with a government we desire and that will allow us to continue air strikes on the rebels and their leaders (not saying I am for that plan but can see it being part of a larger ideal given our past).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»One day AQ fighters are...»Reply #4