Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

TheBlackAdder

(29,981 posts)

8. I wouldn't.

Reply to ileus (Reply #5)

Sat Aug 31, 2013, 12:01 PM

Aug 2013

Though most are misguided and collect various forms of socialism while at the same time decrying it... I wouldn't.

Whether that force is used on people we agree with or don't agree with, accepting that use of force perpetuates it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

No Country Should be Allowed to Use Chemical Weapons Against Its Citizens [View all] AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2013 OP

Except the U.S. because we're exceptional. polichick Aug 2013 #1

Really? Mr_Teg Aug 2013 #2

I suggest you go first for the implanted "non lethal" hostility control chip. mick063 Aug 2013 #4

Or Deadly Guns otohara Aug 2013 #3

Cops have been "shooting each other"? (1) Important if true. AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2013 #9

No Problem otohara Aug 2013 #11

If those had been teabaggers we'd have laughed. ileus Aug 2013 #5

Nope Harmony Blue Aug 2013 #6

I wouldn't. TheBlackAdder Aug 2013 #8

Speak for yourself. polichick Aug 2013 #12

Also lethal injections... dkf Aug 2013 #7

The US, knowing asbestos and radiation were dangerous from the early days... allowed it. TheBlackAdder Aug 2013 #10

You Assume that the Government and the Media are telling you the Truth about Syria? AZ Progressive Aug 2013 #13

If you think that is my assumption, you have me confused with someone else. AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2013 #14