Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Amonester

(11,541 posts)

4. I disagree.

Reply to David__77 (Original post)

Sat Aug 31, 2013, 01:02 PM

Aug 2013

IF a strike on empty buildings ever happens, with no civilian nor military casualties reported, it would be better than the other way around.

It would simply be a serious warning that the next time they'd use CWs, there probably wouldn't be any advanced warnings then.

Not everything is done for immediate consequences.

Some intented consequences are to be read in the fine prints.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Obama's "Shot Across the Bow" Would Make Him a Laughing Stock [View all] David__77 Aug 2013 OP

OP = "obama sucks" crock-o-shit dionysus Aug 2013 #1

He hasn't done it yet! David__77 Aug 2013 #2

believe it or not, i don't want any bombing either, i'm just tired of the hair on fire aspect of dionysus Aug 2013 #3

I disagree. Amonester Aug 2013 #4