Friendly forums for passionate Dems!
More than 94 million posts since 2001
Home Latest Greatest Videos Forums Hide ads Join up!
Home Latest Greatest
Videos Forums Help
Hide ads Join up!
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is The Use of Chemical We...»Reply #10
Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Is The Use of Chemical Weapons Sufficient or Necessary to Justify Force? [View all]

natrlron

(177 posts)
10. Yes,
Reply to leveymg (Reply #1)
Sat Aug 31, 2013, 04:10 PM
Aug 2013

many in Syria, civilians on the rebel side, have said that military strikes will increase the chaos.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Is The Use of Chemical Weapons Sufficient or Necessary to Justify Force? [View all] natrlron Aug 2013 OP
No. No. Particularly when both sides have used them in a civil war that threatens to become regional leveymg Aug 2013 #1
Yes, natrlron Aug 2013 #10
We are not signatories to a treaty prohibiting conventional warfare frazzled Aug 2013 #2
Unfortunately, we don't natrlron Aug 2013 #11
Yes, we didn't ... and it was probably a mistake frazzled Aug 2013 #14
who is the US to criticize the use of chemical warfare? ellenrr Aug 2013 #3
Yes..or should we wait for biological and nuclear attacks ? jessie04 Aug 2013 #4
sure-- when they're used against us.... mike_c Aug 2013 #5
Exactly right! You could not possibly have said it better. 1-Old-Man Aug 2013 #7
President Obama doesn't always disapprove of the use of chemicals against civilians. AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2013 #6
+1000 1-Old-Man Aug 2013 #8
Funny that. I remember we were outrage over this. Not so much when people are dying The Straight Story Aug 2013 #9
Yep, it's racism. You nailed it. NuclearDem Aug 2013 #12
You gonna bite every time the war profiteers scream humanitarian crisis? Hint: They always do. TheKentuckian Aug 2013 #16
Anyone sufficiently outraged to want military action should call 1-888-550-ARMY (2769). AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2013 #17
That is a photo of police (civilians) using pepper spray. What does that have to do with Obama? KittyWampus Aug 2013 #13
Documents Show How White House and Democrats Worked to Protect the Banks Against Protests Snowfield Aug 2013 #15
No American casualties, minimal cost to taxpayers, geek tragedy Aug 2013 #18
Like Vietnam in 1963? leveymg Aug 2013 #20
That is well argued treestar Aug 2013 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is The Use of Chemical We...»Reply #10
Home | Latest Discussions | Greatest Discussions | Latest Videos | All Forums

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2026 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.