Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Does anyone here really think that President Obama would have submitted the Syria [View all]leftstreet
(38,731 posts)10. What if that was the plan all along?
Obama's advisers KNEW that Americans would be against any intervention. The Democrats ESPECIALLY know this - they pummeled the GOP in 2006 and 2008 by going antiwar. Nothing has changed.
GOPers and Democratic hawks seem to want more war than Obama's offering them with limited strikes, so a vote is a strange thing to add to the mix
McCain, Graham Say Obamas Syria Plan Falls Short
August 31 2013.
WASHINGTONTwo key Republican Senate lawmakers gave notice that despite President Barack Obamas pledge to seek congressional authorization for a potential military strike against Syria, they wouldnt support a limited attack that fell short of changing the momentum on the battlefield.
The statement by Sens. John McCain (R., Ariz.) and Lindsey Graham (R., S.C.) demonstrates clearly the challenges the president faces in winning congressional authorization for his plans to punish the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad for allegedly using chemical weapons in an attack last week.
We cannot in good conscience support isolated military strikes in Syria that are not part of an overall strategy that can change the momentum on the battlefield, achieve the presidents stated goal of Assads removal from power, and bring an end to this conflict, which is a growing threat to our national security interests, the senators said in a joint statement.
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2013/08/31/mccain-graham-say-obamas-syria-plan-falls-short/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
29 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Does anyone here really think that President Obama would have submitted the Syria [View all]
HardTimes99
Aug 2013
OP
And yet we have 3 co-equal branches of government not just the one in the big house.
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2013
#15
Perhaps the answer to your question is dependent on your opinion of President Obama?
Liberal Veteran
Aug 2013
#4
I agree with your general point and principles but I have to take issue with your
HardTimes99
Aug 2013
#11
I think junkdrawer nailed it. In that a lot of it had to do with the shock reversal in Great Britain
quinnox
Aug 2013
#8
I could see those Republican assholes preparing two possible ad campaigns for 2014: the first
HardTimes99
Aug 2013
#13
Sorry, somehow missed your reply on my first pass through the responses. If I heard
HardTimes99
Aug 2013
#22
WTF? Why don't we all just shut up, bow down before our monarch (and you) and
HardTimes99
Aug 2013
#16
The people of the US and the UK let them know they have lost our trust and the lack of
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2013
#17
Our countries but the poor Iraqis and Afghans too. So much human tragedy and
HardTimes99
Aug 2013
#18
The rip-tides and cross-currents can at times be bewildering. Does Obama get credit for
HardTimes99
Aug 2013
#23
I don't think I've done or said anything to justify such snarking from you. My
HardTimes99
Aug 2013
#27
Sounds to me like Obama didn't want to be the one hung out to dry when Syria went pear-shaped.
backscatter712
Aug 2013
#28