Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Hulk

(6,699 posts)
41. In TOTAL agreement.
Sat Aug 31, 2013, 10:05 PM
Aug 2013

Last edited Sun Sep 1, 2013, 12:15 AM - Edit history (1)

I get so tired of reading posts from "the bandwagon choir" on these threads. I guess some folks just have a hard time accepting that President Obama can be a mortal human being.
I'm glad he is going to throw this out there to Congress. I'm damn glad in fact.
First of all, it's a "no win situation". Damned if he does something, damned if he doesn't. Personally, I don't want him to do anything. But even his own party are divided, and some are even trashing him...if he does or doesn't; but the reich wingers' heads are exploding over this. "He's a coward, he's weak, he's indecisive", etc.
Smart move. Let THEM debate it. Let them expose how they want to deal with it. Then THEY can be accountable and on record.
It buys more time before he does something we'll ALL regret.
Abbas is on notice. France may do the "dumb thing" first. Maybe not; but it gives all the bitchers and belly-achers a chance to blow their steam. They are going to condemn Obama no matter what he does.
Is gassing 1,429 people so much worse than blowing them up, or shooting them to death? Worse than dropping incindiary bombs on them?
Hell, we dropped atomic bombs on major cities FULL of civilians. We dropped napalm on villages with civilians. I see little difference. It's ALL horrific.
The bottom line is, he hasn't done anything but "warn" yet. We have pulled out of one war. We're pulling out of the other; and we haven't started a new one ...yet. If Willard had won, we'd still be in Iraq, and we most possibly have a war with Iran by now, and boots on the ground in Egypt, Lybia and now, Syria.
Oh yea of so little faith. With supporters like you, who needs enemies?

K n R for an interesting fact to add to the historical record. JimDandy Aug 2013 #1
Make the noise- sometimes the people up top DO hear it! n/t Hydra Aug 2013 #2
This: geek tragedy Aug 2013 #3
Now that this is done, Benton D Struckcheon Aug 2013 #4
God I hope so gopiscrap Aug 2013 #8
This just in: dixiegrrrrl Aug 2013 #33
If only TPTB were as passionate about punishing war criminals and banksters as they were about indepat Aug 2013 #5
+1 leftstreet Aug 2013 #6
+1000 PADemD Aug 2013 #9
Yes but the war criminals and banksters are the gopiscrap Aug 2013 #10
And wonder if any of the war criminals or banksters will profit by yet another war? indepat Aug 2013 #12
of course they do gopiscrap Aug 2013 #13
And this argument should be heard DearAbby Aug 2013 #23
Yup I agree with you! gopiscrap Aug 2013 #24
There is international law Ghost Dog Aug 2013 #22
they're not gonna bite the hands that feed them Skittles Aug 2013 #35
Wow. Where has he left Kerry? JohnnyLib2 Aug 2013 #7
Next to Howard Dean, all used up. Now let's appoint some repugs to the Cabinet. bahrbearian Aug 2013 #21
Meh. Moving on to the next thing. MH1 Aug 2013 #26
Kerry will be on all 5 talks shows tomorrow - for Obama karynnj Aug 2013 #36
It's funny to watch msnbc and count how many times Blue_Tires Aug 2013 #11
+1 proverbialwisdom Aug 2013 #19
its true unfortunately iamthebandfanman Aug 2013 #29
Bull. proverbialwisdom Aug 2013 #32
Chuck Todd is not a reputable reporter neither is NBC a reputable New's Source bahrbearian Aug 2013 #14
I Hear Ya... But... Sometimes A Story Is Offered And One Wants Others To Give Their Analysis... WillyT Aug 2013 #15
I think the Host should have the Option to lock NBC and NY Times Threads, they are not reliable. bahrbearian Aug 2013 #17
NBC is a war profiteer. MNBrewer Aug 2013 #18
Thats Parent company dosen't pay any taxes for war. bahrbearian Aug 2013 #20
Can't stand Rebl Aug 2013 #25
Reuters:Obama's Syria decision: a walk, a debate, and a new approach jakeXT Sep 2013 #47
I would like to know exactly which of his advisors told him to go forward without Congress. TwilightGardener Aug 2013 #16
Stunning that the American President is held in check, ultimately, by UK commoners. libdem4life Aug 2013 #27
Kerry "has no problems" with going to Congress karynnj Aug 2013 #37
Going to Congress is different from making an international statement...it doesn't cut both ways, libdem4life Aug 2013 #38
It was a foregone conclusion that the UN would not back it karynnj Aug 2013 #40
That seems true and is even more depressing. libdem4life Aug 2013 #44
Friday night! Faryn Balyncd Aug 2013 #28
While the British Parliament may reflect the views of the British people dflprincess Aug 2013 #30
That's the truth - nobody represents the people in the U.S.A. polichick Aug 2013 #31
Associated photo. proverbialwisdom Aug 2013 #34
They all have on white shirts. One woman and one person of color. Out of 12...Just an observation libdem4life Aug 2013 #39
Well, there's two people of color actually. senseandsensibility Aug 2013 #42
Was that counting our President? I was just looking down the table and it seemed only Holder libdem4life Aug 2013 #43
Yeah I was counting the President. senseandsensibility Aug 2013 #46
In TOTAL agreement. Hulk Aug 2013 #41
"an allied strike against Syria" Spitfire of ATJ Aug 2013 #45
Now if he asks us and the people can get the Congress to say HELL NO... Jasana Sep 2013 #48
k&r Little Star Sep 2013 #49
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The White House Walk-And-...»Reply #41