Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
69. So what if both parties have problems? I don't deny THAT, not at all.
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 02:08 AM
Sep 2013

Doesn't disprove what I said, though, not in the least.

The good cop bad cop show is for the people, so they can feel good about continuing to vote, thinking it actually makes a difference.


This is, undoubtedly, what they want us to think. Apathy is their best friend, and we had to learn this the hard way back in the '60s when LBJ lost to Nixon(sure, many of the youngsters were out on the streets for the Dems, but guess who won anyway?).



They needed a Dem because that's the only way that they could not have liberals up in arms, moderates as well. People felt so relieved that a Dem, and an extremely charming, educated and articulate Dem who they felt they could trust and depend on, after whose election they breathed a sigh of relief about, that they got complacent. They just believed that with Obama in office it was going to be okay. And that's the perfect scenario for TPTB to start implementing what they want.


Again, here's the problem with this: they actively TRIED to steal the 2012 elections, not just through outright fraud but with voter suppression and other tactics. And if it hadn't been for the dedicated push, and the fact that someone actively interfered with said election theft attempts, we might be discussing President Romney today. When you look at all the evidence, it's not hard to come to the conclusion that I have: They didn't want Obama to win another term and now they're doubling down on the damage control and contingency plans, since Plan A failed so badly.

We may have a long way to go, but we're far from doomed, as of yet. And frankly, much of this NSA hoo-hah ended up being used more of a distraction, anyhow.....and sadly, it looks like the same thing may have been true for the economic issues as well; where they've been trying to hit us the hardest, is really on the social front, and if we were to ever lose that battle, then we'd run a truly great risk of losing the war as a whole. On the up side, if we *win* on that front, then our other battles will be easier to fight.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Because a Republican could never pull it off leftstreet Aug 2013 #1
THE real answer, I'm afraid. FiveGoodMen Aug 2013 #28
Unfortunately, you've hit the nail on its head. n/t TheBlackAdder Aug 2013 #32
The Powers In Charge knew that they needed a Democrat in the WH to rhett o rick Aug 2013 #37
I'm not convinced of that. Remember when their henchman Rove threw a huge hissy fit last year? AverageJoe90 Aug 2013 #40
Yes and I agree. They were only going to give Obama 4 years. Point taken. nm rhett o rick Aug 2013 #41
But who are "they"? freedom fighter jh Aug 2013 #51
"They" controlled both candidates so they were not worried. "They" also control most Dustlawyer Aug 2013 #57
"maybe the people who really run things didn't want a Romney win." I'm sorry. But No. Just no. AverageJoe90 Aug 2013 #65
You need a chill pill. freedom fighter jh Aug 2013 #67
Rove is just a workhorse. He is not even liked by Bush Sr. 'They' are way above the likes sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #70
I disagree about the begging for another Bush. cui bono Aug 2013 #43
I dont disagree. What I said was TPTB figured after Obama, the country would accept a Republican in rhett o rick Aug 2013 #48
heh SammyWinstonJack Aug 2013 #49
What we will find is that the one that wins will appoint (?) the same intelligence leaders, the rhett o rick Aug 2013 #62
True. Makes no real difference anymore. n/t cui bono Aug 2013 #61
"I think they needed a Dem" No, they didn't. AverageJoe90 Aug 2013 #66
Don't agree. That's the theater they want you to see. cui bono Aug 2013 #68
So what if both parties have problems? I don't deny THAT, not at all. AverageJoe90 Sep 2013 #69
True. They did actively try to steal 2012. Perhaps there's 2 levels of "they". cui bono Sep 2013 #75
the real tragedy is that Obama has taken traditional Dem issues away. grasswire Sep 2013 #77
Exactly. Since the Dems are now proposing these things cui bono Sep 2013 #78
First response to the OP nails it. nt NorthCarolina Aug 2013 #45
*authored by Hillary. bunnies Aug 2013 #2
She certainly did help draft this POS OhioChick Aug 2013 #3
Her hubby must be proud. bunnies Aug 2013 #5
I agree OhioChick Aug 2013 #6
Yep. bunnies Aug 2013 #8
It looks like launching disastrous treaties for American workers run in the Clinton family blood. avaistheone1 Aug 2013 #13
Imagine what she'd do as President. bunnies Aug 2013 #19
This seriously adds to my growing list of reservations about Hillary. avaistheone1 Aug 2013 #20
Thats what makes it so infuriating. bunnies Aug 2013 #21
Her hubby Plucketeer Aug 2013 #50
This is only one reason why I will not vote for her. glinda Aug 2013 #11
Same here n/t OhioChick Aug 2013 #16
Same here. No way will I vote for Hillary...her time has come and gone. Raksha Sep 2013 #74
+1000 nt antigop Aug 2013 #31
If enough of us make enough noise about this, she may lose her bullwinkle428 Aug 2013 #14
Yep. bunnies Aug 2013 #18
Good idea. CrispyQ Aug 2013 #25
+ 1 Berlum Aug 2013 #29
Just hope that Amy BlueDog Klobuchar doesn't get chosen. Worse even. glinda Aug 2013 #35
I wish that were possible. We are a small minority. There are lots of DU'ers that will rhett o rick Aug 2013 #42
I did not know that. CrispyQ Aug 2013 #24
This is the biggest betrayal. LiberalAndProud Aug 2013 #4
At one point, I actually believed they were serious. Now, Congress Inside Trades on a Daily Basis. TheBlackAdder Aug 2013 #58
Exactly. Getting TPP passed is multi-national Corps #1 priority. HooptieWagon Aug 2013 #7
Huge K&R. Thank you for keeping this on the front page. woo me with science Aug 2013 #9
Needs to stay on the first page a bit. mick063 Aug 2013 #10
This Is A Big Deal colsohlibgal Aug 2013 #12
Rachel is stuck in "LBGT rights" mode. mick063 Aug 2013 #17
I think you're right. caseymoz Aug 2013 #23
Next time, let's vet our candidates for high office a bit first, okay??? blkmusclmachine Aug 2013 #15
I call it Post-Marxist Liberalism. caseymoz Aug 2013 #22
We don't necessarily need to embrace Marxism - simply the concept of truedelphi Aug 2013 #33
Have you read Marx? caseymoz Aug 2013 #53
+1 leftstreet Aug 2013 #59
You are making some good points. None of which truedelphi Aug 2013 #63
It is alarming,isn't it? LiberalAndProud Aug 2013 #26
"The Corporation" should be required viewing. CrispyQ Aug 2013 #27
I second your idea of watching this film. truedelphi Aug 2013 #34
This shouldn't surprise anyone who has been paying attention. nt TBF Aug 2013 #30
well r & k then. n/t wildbilln864 Aug 2013 #36
Recommend jsr Aug 2013 #38
The same reason he is trying to abolish public ed through his flak Arne Duncan. duffyduff Aug 2013 #39
Abolish??? No, Strengthen. jsr Aug 2013 #46
kick woo me with science Aug 2013 #44
Disgusting, but not surprising MissDeeds Aug 2013 #47
Very astute observation jsr Aug 2013 #56
He's Buy-Partisan Octafish Aug 2013 #52
K&R MotherPetrie Aug 2013 #54
I'll tell you why he's supporting TPP Ocelot Aug 2013 #55
What the hell goes on behind the scenes? Kablooie Aug 2013 #60
Signed. This is such a fucking travesty. Betrayals don't come forestpath Aug 2013 #64
NAFTA was started by GHWB... finished by Clinton markiv Sep 2013 #71
100th rec. n/t Egalitarian Thug Sep 2013 #72
NOTHING Obama has done, has surprised me markiv Sep 2013 #73
So we can sell corn and soybeans overseas Recursion Sep 2013 #76
Thanks for the link. I made good use of it. nt Jasana Sep 2013 #79
I'm assuming this is a rhetorical question. DeSwiss Sep 2013 #80
Anything to weaken US labor and make huge profits for the ruling class. B Calm Sep 2013 #81
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pres. Obama: Why are you ...»Reply #69