Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)40% Of Americans Now Make Less Than 1968 Minimum Wage [View all]
Economist Dean Baker describes one effect of this in Minimum Wage: Who Decided Workers Should Fall Behind?
If the minimum wage had risen in step with productivity growth (since 1968), it would be over $16.50 an hour today. That is higher than the hourly wages earned by 40 percent of men and half of women.
Baker is referring to this CEPR study: The Minimum Wage and Economic Growth.
http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/cepr-blog/the-minimum-wage-and-economic-growth
40% Of Americans Now Make Less Than 1968 Minimum Wage
Read what Baker wrote again. The minimum wage would be $16.50 an hour $33,000 a year if it had kept up with the growth of productivity since 1968. To put the effect of this a different way, 40% of Americans now make less than the 1968 minimum wage, had the minimum wage kept pace with productivity gains.
To put this even another way, the average Americans living standard would be much, much higher today if wages had not decoupled from productivity gains with the gains all going to the 1% instead of being shared by We, the People. If wages had kept pace we wouldnt feel the terrible squeeze that everyone in the middle class is feeling. (Never mind what has happened to those below the middle class.)
This is one more way to understand the effect of income and wealth inequality on each of us. The 1%/99% thing is real. When you hear that the 6 Walmart heirs have more wealth than 1/3 (or more) of all Americans combined, it is real. When you hear that the people on the Forbes list of the 400 wealthiest Americans have more wealth than half of all Americans combined, it is real.
And the effects on the rest of us are real.
Read what Baker wrote again. The minimum wage would be $16.50 an hour $33,000 a year if it had kept up with the growth of productivity since 1968. To put the effect of this a different way, 40% of Americans now make less than the 1968 minimum wage, had the minimum wage kept pace with productivity gains.
To put this even another way, the average Americans living standard would be much, much higher today if wages had not decoupled from productivity gains with the gains all going to the 1% instead of being shared by We, the People. If wages had kept pace we wouldnt feel the terrible squeeze that everyone in the middle class is feeling. (Never mind what has happened to those below the middle class.)
This is one more way to understand the effect of income and wealth inequality on each of us. The 1%/99% thing is real. When you hear that the 6 Walmart heirs have more wealth than 1/3 (or more) of all Americans combined, it is real. When you hear that the people on the Forbes list of the 400 wealthiest Americans have more wealth than half of all Americans combined, it is real.
And the effects on the rest of us are real.
http://seeingtheforest.com/40-of-americans-now-make-less-than-1968-minimum-wage/
74 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In 1968 I was married with two children (age 23) making $1.65 an hour, as a janitor.
bemildred
Sep 2013
#7
We are in the dark ages when it comes to wealth/economics. We dumped royalty 200 years ago, but we
reformist2
Sep 2013
#8
We pretty much ignored de Tocqueville on this, so are now paying dearly for it.
99th_Monkey
Sep 2013
#20
First they impoverish them, then debase, finally they abandon them. That's a deep thought there.
reformist2
Sep 2013
#21
Factual error. Keeping up with inflation not th same as keeping up with productivity
on point
Sep 2013
#9
True. So the banker used to pay you $1 to mow his yard in 1968. Today he pays you $10, and you mow
jtuck004
Sep 2013
#35
And the Reagan revolution continues with brute force under administration after
indepat
Sep 2013
#11
TPTW refuse to reign in capitalism because too many elected officials have garnered a taste
indepat
Sep 2013
#22
Lucky us that the U.S-styled fascism, which abounds with a zeal, is wrapped in the flag and carrying
indepat
Sep 2013
#27
And all bought off Democrats as well! We need to get politicians who will pass real
Dustlawyer
Sep 2013
#44
Now people can understand that when those of us who finished college before 1968 say that
JDPriestly
Sep 2013
#23
I wonder what states have the lowest earnings per family? I could take a wild guess and
demosincebirth
Sep 2013
#29
“The way to make money is to buy when blood is running in the streets.” John D. Rockefeller
jtuck004
Sep 2013
#34
True, but there really isn'a any basis for expecting wages to track productivity
bhikkhu
Sep 2013
#37
I think if the company becomes more productive that all participants...
Half-Century Man
Sep 2013
#50
I'm a Journeyman Electrician specializing in Automated CNC Machining cells...
Half-Century Man
Sep 2013
#58