Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Howard Dean calls Al Jazeera America 'The Fox of the Muslim world' [View all]Catherina
(35,568 posts)14. Have no idea how AJAM covered it but here's the whole Dean context.
To his point that AJAM can't be taken seriously, nobody watching their negotiations thought they'd be any better than AJE which used to be a fine station. The Al Jazeera network exists for propaganda, royal squabbles and exacerbating sectarian strife. Keep the little people divided so the Emir and the House of Saud can divide the spoils as they see fit.
I don't get AJAM so I didn't see the segment he's complaining about but here's the context if it helps.
Rec'd for Dean noticing it can't be taken seriously.
Howard Dean @GovHowardDean 9h
While State occupied with Syria, Maliki attacks unarmed Iranian dissdents. So far 19 dead, five executed with hands tied behind back.
Pretty obvious that Maliki is an Iranian puppet. What is State doing abut this?
Where is the UN, which promised to monitor the safety of the Iranians stuck in Iraq? As is so often the case the are ineffective.
Good chance that when we get the details this makes Maliki a war criminal for ordering unarmed dissidents murdered.
And since the US guaranteed dissidents safety in writing that at least makes us look weak and unreliable if not worse.
We are now apparently supporting a mass murderer as prime minister of Iraq
Death toll now 23 in Iraqi massacre of unarmed Iranian dissidents
34 unarmed dissidents now dead in Iraq. Reports of Iranian intelligence at the scene with senior Iraqi General overseeing the massacre.
Death toll up to 44 in Iraq Massacre as nine unarmed injured Iranian opposition are executed in cold blood. No action from US Govt or UN.
Why are American Taxpayers supporting Arms and other aid to Iraq's Maliki? The are in the pocket of Iran.
Latest from Iraq: 52 dead, 9 missing in Iraqi army attack on unarmed Iranian dissidents. Iraq denies but Tehran confirms and gloats
Al Jazeera's coverage is a joke. They parrot the Iraqi govt line. Al Jazeera America cant be taken seriously. The Fox of the Muslim world
https://twitter.com/GovHowardDean
While State occupied with Syria, Maliki attacks unarmed Iranian dissdents. So far 19 dead, five executed with hands tied behind back.
Pretty obvious that Maliki is an Iranian puppet. What is State doing abut this?
Where is the UN, which promised to monitor the safety of the Iranians stuck in Iraq? As is so often the case the are ineffective.
Good chance that when we get the details this makes Maliki a war criminal for ordering unarmed dissidents murdered.
And since the US guaranteed dissidents safety in writing that at least makes us look weak and unreliable if not worse.
We are now apparently supporting a mass murderer as prime minister of Iraq
Death toll now 23 in Iraqi massacre of unarmed Iranian dissidents
34 unarmed dissidents now dead in Iraq. Reports of Iranian intelligence at the scene with senior Iraqi General overseeing the massacre.
Death toll up to 44 in Iraq Massacre as nine unarmed injured Iranian opposition are executed in cold blood. No action from US Govt or UN.
Why are American Taxpayers supporting Arms and other aid to Iraq's Maliki? The are in the pocket of Iran.
Latest from Iraq: 52 dead, 9 missing in Iraqi army attack on unarmed Iranian dissidents. Iraq denies but Tehran confirms and gloats
Al Jazeera's coverage is a joke. They parrot the Iraqi govt line. Al Jazeera America cant be taken seriously. The Fox of the Muslim world
https://twitter.com/GovHowardDean
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Nope, just as wrong as Dean thinking AJA is owned by Iraqis. It's Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal
Turborama
Sep 2013
#56
You are thinking of this fellow, who owns 7% (No. 2 investor, yes) of that pile of dogshit
MADem
Sep 2013
#61
The guy who was running AJ (Wadah Khanfar) was most assuredly MB-trained; he was fired.
MADem
Sep 2013
#71
Kind of like RT not being good now on LGBT issues, but bless them or having on Thom Hartmann!
cascadiance
Sep 2013
#17
RT sucks on anything that Putin objects to--it's not "RT"--it's the Kremlin News Network...
MADem
Sep 2013
#33
I think a lot of people imagined Howard Dean to be a lot more progressive than he actually was or is
Douglas Carpenter
Sep 2013
#15
I hope it is not upsetting to hear this from me. But I agree with you
Douglas Carpenter
Sep 2013
#20
Then Congressman Bernie Sanders in his 1998 autobiography, Outsider in the House
Douglas Carpenter
Sep 2013
#29
I don't know what all this has to do with him not caring for Al Jazeera
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
Sep 2013
#42
This is some fascinating 1968 historical detail (much thanks for this) and insightful
HardTimes99
Sep 2013
#49
after listening to hours and hours of CNN beating the war drums and pumping out buckets and buckets
Douglas Carpenter
Sep 2013
#19
prior to that Blizter worked for the right-wing Jerusalem Post and for AIPAC
Douglas Carpenter
Sep 2013
#57
yea I remember Wolfie was a leading correspondent at the time. But it was Peter Arnett who
Douglas Carpenter
Sep 2013
#64
attractive Arab women with delightful British accent can't possibly be strong independent women.
Douglas Carpenter
Sep 2013
#31
The ones not reading government bullshit off the teleprompter can be(n/m)
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
Sep 2013
#32
after listening to hours and hours of government stenographer bullshit on CNN
Douglas Carpenter
Sep 2013
#38
But nicer than Ann Coulter, doing the same thing. Ah, the 1% media. Just sayin'
freshwest
Sep 2013
#39
More propaganda because Al Jazeera is more balanced over all, than any news source in this country.
RC
Sep 2013
#59
That clue jumps out like a sore thumb. The campaign against Al Jazeera is pathetic...
Violet_Crumble
Sep 2013
#67
I haven't seen Al Jazeera America, but Al Jazeera English was unbiased in coverage.
joshcryer
Sep 2013
#69