Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Do It right DU : RT banned from /r/news section of Reddit. [View all]muriel_volestrangler
(106,197 posts)46. RT was created to put forward the Kremlin point of view
Russia's Public Diplomacy Effort: What the Kremlin is Doing and Why its Not Working
...
The next major nation re-branding initiative came in April 2005 with
the launch of the news channel Russia Today, which is sponsored by RIA
Novosti and positioned as the first 24/7 English-language news channel
to bring the Russian view on global news. Generously endowed with
resources from state funds, Russia Today quickly developed into a major
news portal, comparable to Al Jazeera English or Germanys DW World,
and currently broadcasts in English and Arabic, with plans to expand into
Spanish. The majority of Russia Todays broadcasts is devoted to Russian
and international news, but the channel also airs documentaries, travel
shows and commentaries on present-day life in Russia. According to Margarita
Simonyan, Russia Todays editor-in-chief, the station was born out
of the desire to present an unbiased portrait of Russia and make Russia
clearer for understanding (CBC News 2006). However, to this end, the
station is often criticized by Westerners and Russians alike for applying a
positive spin on stories about Russian authorities and for refraining from
broadcasting stories that cast a negative light on the Kremlin leadership.
As Finn writes, At first glance it looks a lot like CNN, but it can be a
breathless cheerleader for the Kremlin (Finn 2008, 1).
http://www.princeton.edu/jpia/past-issues-1/2009/6.pdf
...
The next major nation re-branding initiative came in April 2005 with
the launch of the news channel Russia Today, which is sponsored by RIA
Novosti and positioned as the first 24/7 English-language news channel
to bring the Russian view on global news. Generously endowed with
resources from state funds, Russia Today quickly developed into a major
news portal, comparable to Al Jazeera English or Germanys DW World,
and currently broadcasts in English and Arabic, with plans to expand into
Spanish. The majority of Russia Todays broadcasts is devoted to Russian
and international news, but the channel also airs documentaries, travel
shows and commentaries on present-day life in Russia. According to Margarita
Simonyan, Russia Todays editor-in-chief, the station was born out
of the desire to present an unbiased portrait of Russia and make Russia
clearer for understanding (CBC News 2006). However, to this end, the
station is often criticized by Westerners and Russians alike for applying a
positive spin on stories about Russian authorities and for refraining from
broadcasting stories that cast a negative light on the Kremlin leadership.
As Finn writes, At first glance it looks a lot like CNN, but it can be a
breathless cheerleader for the Kremlin (Finn 2008, 1).
http://www.princeton.edu/jpia/past-issues-1/2009/6.pdf
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
90 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
LBN Host confirms rule. Hey, people are still free to post RT sourced stuff in GD or Politics 2013.
NYC_SKP
Sep 2013
#84
Where do you think those anti gay policies and vicious rhetoric come from, the Bolshoi?
Bluenorthwest
Sep 2013
#20
That doesn't mean that the OP thinks that's why it should be banned. That was my question.
David__77
Sep 2013
#21
So you 'don't agree' but still think those who foist those hateful policies are trustworthy sources?
Bluenorthwest
Sep 2013
#28
I think it should be because of the scores of Russia Today articles that I've read
Kurska
Sep 2013
#22
Why are some DU'ers so torqued about it? Because it's the only source claiming false flag in Syria.
KittyWampus
Sep 2013
#7
So that's it. Questioning the source of the Syrian Gas attack will be verboten soon....
Junkdrawer
Sep 2013
#25
Well, that, and how are we gonna have our daily hissyfits without hot unsourced made up lies?
NYC_SKP
Sep 2013
#85
Exactly, we should quote them uniquely when we want to show what their leader want to express.
Sand Wind
Sep 2013
#12
And again you dig that Kremlin no matter how viciously they attack gay people. Good for you.
Bluenorthwest
Sep 2013
#29
There's gonna be a really long list of media to ban if that's the right metric.
David__77
Sep 2013
#31
Not the news sections. Reddit is huge, news has over 1 million subscribers, world news over 3 mill
The Straight Story
Sep 2013
#39
Is it just my impression or do news,politics and worldnews have less recs than pics ?
jakeXT
Sep 2013
#52
Generally yes, most voted on are usually the pics and such on a broad scale
The Straight Story
Sep 2013
#53
Indeed, I stay out of them as well. One other thing I that I do hate there
The Straight Story
Sep 2013
#56
there is no question that RT is biased and has an agenda. That's obvious. But can ANYONE watch CNN
Douglas Carpenter
Sep 2013
#33
I'm 60 yrs old. I'm perfectly capable of listening to ALL sides and filtering agendas....
Junkdrawer
Sep 2013
#35
VOA clearly, BBC got a huge history of being independant, if not a lot of time against
Sand Wind
Sep 2013
#42
Public broadcasting and outright state mouthpieces are two slightly different things. (nt)
Posteritatis
Sep 2013
#60
VOA is a state piece. Believe it or not rt falls in the category of BBC
nadinbrzezinski
Sep 2013
#63