Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Do It right DU : RT banned from /r/news section of Reddit. [View all]Sand Wind
(1,573 posts)47. Except that you found this on RT Wikipedia :
Russia Today has been described by Konstantin Preobrazhensky, himself a former Soviet KGB officer who defected to the West, as a part of the Russian industry of misinformation and manipulation designed to mislead foreign audiences about Russian intentions. He says Russia Today television utilizes methods of propaganda that are managed by Directorate A of the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service. He explains, The specialty of Directorate A is deceiving world public opinion and manipulating it. It has got a lot of experience over decades of the Cold War.
After the 2005 announcement the station would be launched, the U.S. government-owned Voice of America (VOA)[107] interviewed Anton Nosik, chief editor of MosNews.com, who said the creation of Russia Today "smacks of Soviet-style propaganda campaigns."[108] A representative of Reporters Without Borders called the newly announced network another step of the state to control information.[109] In 2009 Luke Harding in The Guardian described Russia Today's advertising campaign in the United Kingdom as an "ambitious attempt to create a new post-Soviet global propaganda empire."[33]
In 2010 The Independent reported that RT journalists had revealed that coverage of sensitive issues in Russia is allowed, but direct criticism of Vladimir Putin or then President Dmitry Medvedev is not.[23] Masha Karp wrote in Standpoint magazine that contemporary Russian issues "such as the suppression of free speech and peaceful demonstrations, or the economic inefficiency and corrupt judiciary, are either ignored or their significance played down".[110] In 2008 Stephen Heyman wrote in the New York Times that in RTs Russia, corruption is not quite a scourge but a symptom of a developing economy.[21]
Russians also have been critical of RT. Former KGB officer Konstantin Preobrazhensky criticized RT as "a part of the Russian industry of misinformation and manipulation".[111] Andrey Illarionov, former advisor to Vladimir Putin, has labeled the channel as "the best Russian propaganda machine targeted at the outside world. On the other hand, prominent Russian officials such as Foreign Minister of Russia Sergey Lavrov are strong advocates of RT."[72]
James Kirchick in The New Republic accused the network of "often virulent anti-Americanism, worshipful portrayal of Russian leaders."[112] Ed Lucas wrote in The Economist (quoted in Al Jazeera) that the core of RT was "anti-Westernism."[113] Julia Ioffe wrote "Often, it seemed that Russia Today was just a way to stick it to the U.S. from behind the façade of legitimate newsgathering."[31] Shaun Walker wrote in The Independent that RT "has made a name for itself as a strident critic of US policy."[114] Allesandra Stanley in The New York Times wrote that RT is "like the Voice of America, only with more money and a zesty anti-American slant."[47] David Weigel writes that RT goes further than merely creating distrust of the United States government, to saying, in effect: "You can trust the Russians more than you can trust those bastards."[29]
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
90 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
LBN Host confirms rule. Hey, people are still free to post RT sourced stuff in GD or Politics 2013.
NYC_SKP
Sep 2013
#84
Where do you think those anti gay policies and vicious rhetoric come from, the Bolshoi?
Bluenorthwest
Sep 2013
#20
That doesn't mean that the OP thinks that's why it should be banned. That was my question.
David__77
Sep 2013
#21
So you 'don't agree' but still think those who foist those hateful policies are trustworthy sources?
Bluenorthwest
Sep 2013
#28
I think it should be because of the scores of Russia Today articles that I've read
Kurska
Sep 2013
#22
Why are some DU'ers so torqued about it? Because it's the only source claiming false flag in Syria.
KittyWampus
Sep 2013
#7
So that's it. Questioning the source of the Syrian Gas attack will be verboten soon....
Junkdrawer
Sep 2013
#25
Well, that, and how are we gonna have our daily hissyfits without hot unsourced made up lies?
NYC_SKP
Sep 2013
#85
Exactly, we should quote them uniquely when we want to show what their leader want to express.
Sand Wind
Sep 2013
#12
And again you dig that Kremlin no matter how viciously they attack gay people. Good for you.
Bluenorthwest
Sep 2013
#29
There's gonna be a really long list of media to ban if that's the right metric.
David__77
Sep 2013
#31
Not the news sections. Reddit is huge, news has over 1 million subscribers, world news over 3 mill
The Straight Story
Sep 2013
#39
Is it just my impression or do news,politics and worldnews have less recs than pics ?
jakeXT
Sep 2013
#52
Generally yes, most voted on are usually the pics and such on a broad scale
The Straight Story
Sep 2013
#53
Indeed, I stay out of them as well. One other thing I that I do hate there
The Straight Story
Sep 2013
#56
there is no question that RT is biased and has an agenda. That's obvious. But can ANYONE watch CNN
Douglas Carpenter
Sep 2013
#33
I'm 60 yrs old. I'm perfectly capable of listening to ALL sides and filtering agendas....
Junkdrawer
Sep 2013
#35
VOA clearly, BBC got a huge history of being independant, if not a lot of time against
Sand Wind
Sep 2013
#42
Public broadcasting and outright state mouthpieces are two slightly different things. (nt)
Posteritatis
Sep 2013
#60
VOA is a state piece. Believe it or not rt falls in the category of BBC
nadinbrzezinski
Sep 2013
#63