Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Kerry: 'FUCK Congress!! POTUS is bombing the shit out of Syria anyway' <-paraphrase [View all]Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)36. Again... what didn't they get right?
Do YOU work for the NSA?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Kerry: 'FUCK Congress!! POTUS is bombing the shit out of Syria anyway' <-paraphrase [View all]
99th_Monkey
Sep 2013
OP
Post a direct quote from Kerry and I will never use the term ODS again...
Liberal_Stalwart71
Sep 2013
#14
It's not my OP. I just think the stupid acronym is a piss poor attampt to argue or debate.
morningfog
Sep 2013
#33
ODS is apropos for a segment of the population that has a knee-jerk negative reaction
Liberal_Stalwart71
Sep 2013
#40
So basically ODS is just the hip new term for an all-inclusive evil racist ant-Presidential strawman
Dragonfli
Sep 2013
#49
"Segment of the population" does not equal "all inclusive". Reading comprehension is key!! ;)
Liberal_Stalwart71
Sep 2013
#53
Yes I know, there are none in the BOG for instance, but you still see them everywhere don't you?
Dragonfli
Sep 2013
#55
Very cool! We have an argument to be made, but probably don't want it lost...
Cooley Hurd
Sep 2013
#17
Yep, count on the guardian for your news sources, they might not have the right details
Thinkingabout
Sep 2013
#5
It should not matter what the subject is about when they print incorrect details and do not correct
Thinkingabout
Sep 2013
#18
they are like reading the rags as you go through the check out line, I dont believe
Thinkingabout
Sep 2013
#25
In other words yes, you don't trust The Guardian because they gave Snowden ink.
99th_Monkey
Sep 2013
#22
Articles like the responses received indicated a great willingness to post incorrect details and I
Thinkingabout
Sep 2013
#37
From the transcript we know what the administration wants and Kerry makes clear
Jefferson23
Sep 2013
#31
How about: 'this gravy train for defense contractors has already left the station...'
99th_Monkey
Sep 2013
#46
You could be equally wrong & use Assad's paraphrase. People see events through their tinted glasses.
Bernardo de La Paz
Sep 2013
#48
instead of "paraphrase" you should have used "hyperbole"-more exact description NT
sigmasix
Sep 2013
#54