General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Doctors Without Borders confirmed: "mass exposure to a neurotoxic agent" [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)"The distinction between discussion and propaganda is honesty.
You are clearly shilling for the Administration's policy of taking military action against Syria. And you are cloaking that with the horror of chemical war. "
Are you seriously trying to dismiss the atrocity of a chemical attack?
"Will you support military action against the opposition if that is the source of the chemical weapons? "
If they are responsible, they should be held accountable.
Now that your hypothetical has been addressed, who do you believe is responsible.
I believe it's the Assad government. If you don't know who is responsible, then you are going to have to determine from the evidence presented by the U.S. or UN.
The U.S. government is going to take action based on what it knows.
"And you are calling for military action because that is what the Administration is calling for."
No, I'm not. Congress will have this debate and will decide.
"Disabuse me of my misperception. Either state if you are or are not calling for military action and , for the fourth time, please answer my question."
Your problem is that you're too focused on my opinion, and not the facts. It doesn't matter what I want. I am more interested in the facts surrounding the attack. This is what will determine who should be held accountable, something you apparently aren't interested in.
The UN is going to issue a report. I'm also interested in its findings.