Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Spot ON! nt adirondacker Sep 2013 #1
It shows that Obama is SERIOUS! Leaders must listen to what he says! n2doc Sep 2013 #2
Don't you mean RoccoR5955 Sep 2013 #10
I always wondered about that 'leader of the free world' thing. Do they know sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #13
"Free Countries"?? Oh, The Ones Supporting Death Squads HumansAndResources Sep 2013 #82
Well, I'm talking about European countries, Latin American countries, Australia, India, iow, sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #91
From my perspective, if it's true that Bashar Al-Assad used nerve gas cheapdate Sep 2013 #17
What message is that? n2doc Sep 2013 #22
It doesn't pass the smell test. Enthusiast Sep 2013 #30
The message would be that there will be a significant price to pay cheapdate Sep 2013 #47
So, we weaken Assad, and strengthen Al Qaida? n2doc Sep 2013 #49
Russian CW? Or Saudi Arabian? HumansAndResources Sep 2013 #83
You laid out the pros and cons very well lyonn Sep 2013 #23
There are no pros. nt awoke_in_2003 Sep 2013 #45
Do you think that using nerve agents on populated areas cheapdate Sep 2013 #48
Violence begets violence n2doc Sep 2013 #50
I believe there is much more going on along cheapdate Sep 2013 #54
So the purpose is to basically masturbate our sense of self-righteousness? Scootaloo Sep 2013 #52
That's an outrageously cynical way to frame cheapdate Sep 2013 #58
I don't think you understand the concept of morals. Scootaloo Sep 2013 #64
We agree that for the sake of argument cheapdate Sep 2013 #71
You know, I was accused of "supporting Saddam" in 2003, too. Scootaloo Sep 2013 #75
I agree with most all of your points cheapdate Sep 2013 #109
Well, here's the thing... Scootaloo Sep 2013 #110
I agree, Scootaloo, but fear most Americans aren't hearing any of these arguments drynberg Sep 2013 #74
We have learned from the past that anything can be staged! juajen Sep 2013 #55
I don't have any doubt that there was a release of nerve gas cheapdate Sep 2013 #59
Yep, but we are the "shoot and ask questions later" bandits juajen Sep 2013 #53
NO,,, Cryptoad Sep 2013 #27
Who will the cruise missile target? Assad? me b zola Sep 2013 #44
Even a short action could inflict substantial losses to the Assad government's cheapdate Sep 2013 #51
Yes, we will be killing "little people" to show that killing "little people" WHEN CRABS ROAR Sep 2013 #62
How many innocent civilians should die so he can be delivered his message? Marrah_G Sep 2013 #70
There is no crystal ball. cheapdate Sep 2013 #72
I have a question about that rpannier Sep 2013 #78
Yes, dead is dead. cheapdate Sep 2013 #80
"free world(tm)"? Ocelot Sep 2013 #19
What about the following part? lark Sep 2013 #43
France might. Maybe. Israel would rather let us do the hard stuff. n2doc Sep 2013 #46
Have heard nothing affirmative about France taking part. lark Sep 2013 #103
Not true. Many countries in the region are pushing for action, cheapdate Sep 2013 #61
Paragons of Virtue? I don't find any evidence of moral-authority there. HumansAndResources Sep 2013 #86
Yes, no one's hands are clean. cheapdate Sep 2013 #87
Is it definite that the Syrian government is responsible? deutsey Sep 2013 #95
That would, of course, depend on who you ask. cheapdate Sep 2013 #104
That's my understanding as well deutsey Sep 2013 #111
Many of the Earlier CW Reports were Blamed on the Rebels HumansAndResources Sep 2013 #113
Assad was fighting the rebels in areas cheapdate Sep 2013 #114
Perhaps Familiarity With Bush's Support For the Jihadis in Libya Since 2007 Is More Persuasive? HumansAndResources Sep 2013 #115
Did George W. Bush cause millions of Syrians to stage nationwide demonstrations cheapdate Sep 2013 #116
Are they supporting action materially? lark Sep 2013 #102
I've heard variously that some are and some aren't. cheapdate Sep 2013 #108
Couldn't have said it better. mbperrin Sep 2013 #3
The NEW "Care Packages!" Mark our Rockets and Bombs with that Logo. n/t KoKo Sep 2013 #4
Almost like the US was just looking for a reason to bomb Syria. valerief Sep 2013 #5
Ya think? RC Sep 2013 #12
Took the words right out of my mouth. nt valerief Sep 2013 #14
Yeah, have to pay for important things first.... daleanime Sep 2013 #16
Also add in the rationale for ever more surveillance and extra justification for the alphabet suffragette Sep 2013 #18
that'll leave a mark. KG Sep 2013 #6
. . . but hey, at least Chuckles isn't a member of the "Batshit Insane" party, right? HughBeaumont Sep 2013 #7
who writes the rules to this game, anyway? Supersedeas Sep 2013 #85
Great post! K&R Rebellious Republican Sep 2013 #8
"So would a Facebook, with fewer casualties." 99Forever Sep 2013 #9
We should be amazed we live in an age where this thinking is now mainstream! reformist2 Sep 2013 #11
The medium is the message, I guess. nt valerief Sep 2013 #15
sob! admit it made me laugh. oldandhappy Sep 2013 #20
Basically just a glib gloss. gulliver Sep 2013 #21
Really? How's the drug war going? nt Union Scribe Sep 2013 #25
Another glib gloss. nt gulliver Sep 2013 #26
An inconvenient question Bradical79 Sep 2013 #34
The defense rests. nt gulliver Sep 2013 #35
sure Bradical79 Sep 2013 #37
What?!? chervilant Sep 2013 #29
Think context. gulliver Sep 2013 #31
"Blah, blah, blah, Ginger, blah, blah, blah..." chervilant Sep 2013 #38
In that case I guess we should have lobbed a few into Wall Street. Enthusiast Sep 2013 #32
We should have bombed the BeeJeezus out of BP Vanje Sep 2013 #42
like when we punished saddam? frylock Sep 2013 #39
This is different. gulliver Sep 2013 #40
I have a question about that. ChaoticTrilby Sep 2013 #68
Rulers NEVER Care about "The Troops" - Kissinger: "... dumb, stupid animals to be used" HumansAndResources Sep 2013 #89
Of course. ChaoticTrilby Sep 2013 #112
Maybe the least informative posts I have seen this week. n-t Logical Sep 2013 #84
Surreal. pecwae Sep 2013 #93
K&R MotherPetrie Sep 2013 #24
And delivered by a Nobel Peace Prize recipient. Graybeard Sep 2013 #28
I think I'll join you. nt ChaoticTrilby Sep 2013 #69
The Nobel commitee was punked :( Marrah_G Sep 2013 #73
He must be reading DU nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #33
Cause nothing says "moral authority" like indiscriminate missile strikes. DirkGently Sep 2013 #36
does any1 know questionseverything Sep 2013 #41
Cost for a Tomahwak Deacon Blue Sep 2013 #88
Good lord... deutsey Sep 2013 #96
ggod cartoon and thought provoking gopiscrap Sep 2013 #56
OMG!! Tom T hits it out of the freaking park, AGAIN!! K&R ~nt 99th_Monkey Sep 2013 #57
Right on. felix_numinous Sep 2013 #60
"Our opinions mean NOTHING to them" and there you have it. WHEN CRABS ROAR Sep 2013 #65
Yes felix_numinous Sep 2013 #66
Been involved in the movements since civil rights. WHEN CRABS ROAR Sep 2013 #77
K&R DeSwiss Sep 2013 #63
K&R NealK Sep 2013 #67
K&R idwiyo Sep 2013 #76
If Obama sends a strongly worded Facebook post ... Martin Eden Sep 2013 #79
In all seriousness . . . another_liberal Sep 2013 #81
Yup. It could really backfire. avaistheone1 Sep 2013 #92
It will never stop there. McCain was chirruping excitedly DirkGently Sep 2013 #99
He most likely gets a campaign contribution . . . another_liberal Sep 2013 #105
He doesn't meet many ME countries he doesn't want DirkGently Sep 2013 #106
Most decidedly. another_liberal Sep 2013 #107
Something just occurred to me about the old "Iraq sent their chem weapons to Syria" line. Marr Sep 2013 #90
Taking out planes that would deliver chemical attacks does say we care michigandem58 Sep 2013 #94
Unless you lived near the planes. morningfog Sep 2013 #97
Perfect isn't an option michigandem58 Sep 2013 #100
So, we could kill, what, 1490 and they should thank us? morningfog Sep 2013 #101
Except that planes didn't deliver the chemical weapons. bullwinkle428 Sep 2013 #98
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This Modern World: And Aw...»Reply #8