Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FreeJoe

(1,039 posts)
16. It's not nearly that easy.
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 11:14 AM
Sep 2013

Take the hypothetical example of American Mining Company. They have operations in the US and abroad. Their overseas operations have generated $1 billion dollars in profits that they have retained but kept overseas. If we decide to tax it, that $1 billion dollars is worth $650 million dollars after taxes. On the other hand, if Australian Mining Company were to buy them, that $1 billion would still be $1 billion dollars. Australian Mining Company has probably been watching American Mining Company for years, watching to see if it makes sense to buy them. With this new tax plan, it certainly does. They aren't buying them for tax evasion reasons. They are just buying them because American Mining Company is now worth more to them than it is to US owners.

The United States is virtually the only country that tries to tax corporations on their overseas profits when they bring that money into the US. It was a nice idea, but it hasn't worked very well. Trying to tax them on their profits while those profits remain overseas just won't work. That's why no one is seriously putting forward the idea.

It would make much more sense to reform corporate taxes (trading fewer deductions in favor of rates more in line with other developed countries) and to try to crack down on bogus transfers of intellectual property.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R Scuba Sep 2013 #1
Of course the congresscritters' corporate owners would never let them pass this. hobbit709 Sep 2013 #2
Too Far Royal777 Sep 2013 #20
Or they could use the money for unending war and to spy on citizens. dkf Sep 2013 #3
or on tax cuts for working families eShirl Sep 2013 #4
we badly need corporate tax reform in this country Celebration Sep 2013 #5
And two years later the owners buy MORE tax breaks from Congress......... socialist_n_TN Sep 2013 #15
How would you stop... FreeJoe Sep 2013 #6
That is an easy one. Half-Century Man Sep 2013 #10
It's not nearly that easy. FreeJoe Sep 2013 #16
Yes they could. But they won't. radiclib Sep 2013 #7
it's not that easy alc Sep 2013 #8
Easiest thing would be to prohibit the corporation as a business organization. mbperrin Sep 2013 #12
Yeah, that'll work ...... oldhippie Sep 2013 #17
Yes. Let business owners operate as partners in the same manner as Lloyd's of London. AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2013 #21
Yes, in their pre-1994 mode, where "Names" faced unlimited personal liability for their decisions. mbperrin Sep 2013 #23
Until we push (hard) and achieve campaign finance reform and publicly funded elections, Dustlawyer Sep 2013 #9
Where's the "idea"? The article just says to tax money held offshore 7962 Sep 2013 #11
How would you figure we have the highest corporate tax in the world? mbperrin Sep 2013 #13
If the government owns half the company, you cant compare the two. 7962 Sep 2013 #14
Well, you're on the verge of understanding something. mbperrin Sep 2013 #18
Well, I cant put my 401 anywhere but where my company SAYS I can 7962 Sep 2013 #19
Consumption tax is the worst ever. mbperrin Sep 2013 #22
Havent TOTALLY abandoned the 401! 7962 Sep 2013 #24
Good. mbperrin Sep 2013 #25
But isn't Congress being paid by the very wealthy to NOT do this? nt valerief Sep 2013 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»An Easy Way to Squeeze a ...»Reply #16