Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Pssssst the level of radiation at Fukushima is now 18 times higher [View all]questionseverything
(11,849 posts)86. how about reuters?
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2013/08/14/us-japan-fukushima-insight-idUKBRE97D00M20130814
Tokyo Electric Power Co (Tepco) is already in a losing battle to stop radioactive water overflowing from another part of the facility, and experts question whether it will be able to pull off the removal of all the assemblies successfully.
"They are going to have difficulty in removing a significant number of the rods," said Arnie Gundersen, a veteran U.S. nuclear engineer and director of Fairewinds Energy Education, who used to build fuel assemblies.
The operation, beginning this November at the plant's Reactor No. 4, is fraught with danger, including the possibility of a large release of radiation if a fuel assembly breaks, gets stuck or gets too close to an adjacent bundle, said Gundersen and other nuclear experts.
That could lead to a worse disaster than the March 2011 nuclear crisis at the Fukushima plant, the world's most serious since Chernobyl in 1986.
No one knows how bad it can get, but independent consultants Mycle Schneider and Antony Froggatt said recently in their World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2013: "Full release from the Unit-4 spent fuel pool, without any containment or control, could cause by far the most serious radiological disaster to date."
Tepco has already removed two unused fuel assemblies from the pool in a test operation last year, but these rods are less dangerous than the spent bundles. Extracting spent fuel is a normal part of operations at a nuclear plant, but safely plucking them from a badly damaged reactor is unprecedented.
"To jump to the conclusion that it is going to work just fine for the rest of them is quite a leap of logic," said Gundersen.
Tokyo Electric Power Co (Tepco) is already in a losing battle to stop radioactive water overflowing from another part of the facility, and experts question whether it will be able to pull off the removal of all the assemblies successfully.
"They are going to have difficulty in removing a significant number of the rods," said Arnie Gundersen, a veteran U.S. nuclear engineer and director of Fairewinds Energy Education, who used to build fuel assemblies.
The operation, beginning this November at the plant's Reactor No. 4, is fraught with danger, including the possibility of a large release of radiation if a fuel assembly breaks, gets stuck or gets too close to an adjacent bundle, said Gundersen and other nuclear experts.
That could lead to a worse disaster than the March 2011 nuclear crisis at the Fukushima plant, the world's most serious since Chernobyl in 1986.
No one knows how bad it can get, but independent consultants Mycle Schneider and Antony Froggatt said recently in their World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2013: "Full release from the Unit-4 spent fuel pool, without any containment or control, could cause by far the most serious radiological disaster to date."
Tepco has already removed two unused fuel assemblies from the pool in a test operation last year, but these rods are less dangerous than the spent bundles. Extracting spent fuel is a normal part of operations at a nuclear plant, but safely plucking them from a badly damaged reactor is unprecedented.
"To jump to the conclusion that it is going to work just fine for the rest of them is quite a leap of logic," said Gundersen.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
137 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Exactly send in all the TEPCO executives in at gunpoint. Tell them they ought to hurry.
Katashi_itto
Sep 2013
#34
Perfect example of the minimization of corporate actions we are exposed to daily. NT
Trillo
Sep 2013
#110
While the Belafonte version was available, I found this vid more appropriate to the conversation.
TalkingDog
Sep 2013
#22
When science and technology are used for corporate profits and corporate control
malaise
Sep 2013
#16
yes, englis, over the air, japanese news and culture all day, lots on fukushima and tsunami, channel
Liberal_in_LA
Sep 2013
#57
Pssssst there were about 2 buckets of water on the ground that were highly radioactive
wtmusic
Sep 2013
#46
Isn't Tepco the company that is trying to cover their asses with good PR right now?
Jamastiene
Sep 2013
#105
Fukushima water leak likely went undetected for more than a month
muriel_volestrangler
Sep 2013
#130
It's not 'speculation' - multiple news reports say 300 tonnes, not 23 gallons
muriel_volestrangler
Sep 2013
#137
The radiation levels in Tokyo are less than New York, Paris, London, or Beijing.
wtmusic
Sep 2013
#65
There is a BIG ocean between us. It keeps us safe. Nothing bad will ever happen.
Safetykitten
Sep 2013
#53
This is about equivalent to saying the temperature in New York City is 350 degrees
wtmusic
Sep 2013
#66
I have eaten salmon caught from the Hanford Reach (near Richland) many, many times.
mick063
Sep 2013
#97
The U.S. wants to go to war in Syria because "chemical weapons" were used to kill people.
Trillo
Sep 2013
#111
I am thousands of times more worried about this poison than what is alleged to be in Syria
kenny blankenship
Sep 2013
#134