Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

treestar

(82,383 posts)

8. That's a good point

Reply to KT2000 (Reply #6)

Mon Sep 2, 2013, 10:21 PM

Sep 2013

It is obviously something of international concern. Syria is one of the few parties who did not sign the Convention. Maybe we should have gone in to destroy those weapons before they even got into a war.

The other countries are Angola, North Korea, Egypt and South Sudan. What a group.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I know that chemical and biological weapons are nasty and cruel... [View all] WCGreen Sep 2013 OP

If we bomb, innocent lives will be lost. In_The_Wind Sep 2013 #1

Nothing will change. Syrian people will die from our bombs and missiles Autumn Sep 2013 #2

We also need to think about what we're doing here at home: polichick Sep 2013 #3

There are no good choices here... CaliforniaPeggy Sep 2013 #4

Great post. Thanks. 99th_Monkey Sep 2013 #5

the work on banning chemical weapons KT2000 Sep 2013 #6

I surely agree with you... WCGreen Sep 2013 #7

That's a good point treestar Sep 2013 #8

Very true. There's plenty of brutality in "conventional weapons". backscatter712 Sep 2013 #9

I believe the distinction is made in that they are utterly indiscriminate 1-Old-Man Sep 2013 #10