Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bhikkhu

(10,789 posts)
16. I agree. You can trivialize the result, but doing nothing sends a whole different message
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 09:46 PM
Sep 2013

Assad is winning the war, and one of his tactics is using chemical weapons to clear out opposition held areas.

The last thing we need is to a demonstration of how well that works, and how the rest of the world, in spite of international law, no longer really cares. Gadhafi and every other deposed dictator would be kicking themselves (from their grave or not) for not realizing.

One of the reasons chemical warfare was done away with in the first place was how effective it was at killing large numbers of people. Troublesome neighborhood? Local unrest? Protests? Check the wind, turn the gas loose, and the problem is gone by the end of the day. You don't need a large military to rule then, and you certainly don't need the consent of the populace.

That would be the message of doing nothing.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Either we should go for r...»Reply #16