Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

HumansAndResources

(229 posts)
15. EXACTLY !! And "Special Legal Monopolies" to boot
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 10:25 PM
Sep 2013

See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCarran%E2%80%93Ferguson_Act

So they are Both Right and Both Wrong (though my sentiments align with the questioner). Yes, competition would be helpful in reducing cost, but there isn't any. Single-Payer would be much better than what we got, or what we had before.

But Empowered Citizens, with the land and resources of this wealthy nation, could ALL afford to pay for insurance - especially if insurance companies, pharmaceuticals, and hospitals were not-for-profit - like hospitals and insurance were through the 1970s, when the costs were much lower. This was before Bill Frist's father / HCA went around "privatizing" the hospitals, and brought us the $10 aspirin.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Justin Amash (R) gets Tow...»Reply #15