Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

fujiyama

(15,185 posts)
33. OK, personally I think Ron and his offspring are nuts
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 12:22 AM
Sep 2013

but on the issue of foreign intervention, I am more in agreement with that wing of the crazy party than I am even with the Democratic wing that thinks we can solve all problems abroad with a few cruise missiles.

Right now on the issue of building and maintaining an empire, the neo-conservative mindset IS the established viewpoint and is considered serious and mainstream. Why is that? Just yelling "fuck the Pauls" feels great but in reality the Pauls on this issue are talking more sense than McCain, Graham, and the (thankfully ex-Senator) Lieberman who are all in favor of the intervention (and are more die-hard than the president in wanting an intervention).

I actually do hope the House and Senate vote overwhelmingly against getting involved in Syria. Chemical weapons are nasty and the death of over a hundred thousand civilians is horrific, but the reality is people have been getting killed there for over two years. There is nothing we can do to achieve peace.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Well, if Ron Paul is against a response.... jessie04 Sep 2013 #1
Still puking out the pauls bullshit... Ohio Joe Sep 2013 #2
+1 sagat Sep 2013 #3
Yes, screw him LukeFL Sep 2013 #21
From the fucking Daily Caller... SidDithers Sep 2013 #48
Tell me, what do you intend to achieve by posting this? 2ndAmForComputers Sep 2013 #4
Probably the same as yesterdays post Ohio Joe Sep 2013 #5
That was Rand (nt) Nye Bevan Sep 2013 #7
I'm sure you are happy you cover all of the pauls bullshit Ohio Joe Sep 2013 #8
You disagree with his argument? (nt) Nye Bevan Sep 2013 #9
I disagree with pushing ronulan bullshit Ohio Joe Sep 2013 #10
There is no argument... FarPoint Sep 2013 #51
Well, I'm glad he will vote no. David__77 Sep 2013 #6
He retired from the house in 2012 to run for president so he no longer gets to vote.... Rowdyboy Sep 2013 #14
My bad. David__77 Sep 2013 #26
So, will this at least offset the CakeGrrl Sep 2013 #11
Fuck Ron Paul BootinUp Sep 2013 #12
ron paul is a neo-con bigot and racist. Cerridwen Sep 2013 #13
Well just for the sake of accuracy (and I certainly am not interested in defending Paul) fujiyama Sep 2013 #34
Paul is not even remotely a neocon. As for being a racist I cannot say. nt Demo_Chris Sep 2013 #38
You can't judge Ron Paul's stand on anything by the way he votes. Good Old Ron, attach his Thinkingabout Sep 2013 #15
Which bill was this? I am going to LukeFL Sep 2013 #25
It wasn't a bill, there were several, a google search will develop several sites with information Thinkingabout Sep 2013 #31
He can't vote, so does this mean his son is a no vote in the senate? Hmm. n/t Jefferson23 Sep 2013 #16
This post was alerted on.. 4-2 to keep. X_Digger Sep 2013 #17
That is ok, it was really a Terms of Service alert Ohio Joe Sep 2013 #20
You want the admin to ts a regular poster, here for nine years? Skip Intro Sep 2013 #35
For one post... No Ohio Joe Sep 2013 #36
I very rarely post about either of the Pauls. Nye Bevan Sep 2013 #44
Good alert... SidDithers Sep 2013 #50
"The alert reads as rather thin-skinned and intolerant". Nye Bevan Sep 2013 #23
Some folks do seem to have a shallow, almost un-principled stance on some issues. X_Digger Sep 2013 #30
What is your opinion of Rand Raul? hrmjustin Sep 2013 #18
I agree with him on pot, but not much else (nt) Nye Bevan Sep 2013 #19
I find him to be an icky creature. hrmjustin Sep 2013 #22
He is not ok with pot, it is typical ronulan bullshit Ohio Joe Sep 2013 #24
What he is really for BootinUp Sep 2013 #27
That is a better description of it Ohio Joe Sep 2013 #29
Crazy mentality LukeFL Sep 2013 #28
Fuck Ron Paul 2ndAmForComputers Sep 2013 #32
OK, personally I think Ron and his offspring are nuts fujiyama Sep 2013 #33
Fucking sick that Ron Paul will be the anti-war voice. Luminous Animal Sep 2013 #37
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2013 #42
I don't. Not for a moment and neither should any peace Dem. Luminous Animal Sep 2013 #43
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2013 #39
Even a broken clock is right twice a day. avaistheone1 Sep 2013 #40
Fuck Ron Paul ismnotwasm Sep 2013 #41
Ron Paul is a little like Putin ... JustABozoOnThisBus Sep 2013 #45
Let's be honest and admit the truth. On some things RON Paul is wronger than almost any right-wing Douglas Carpenter Sep 2013 #46
He's correct on this. woo me with science Sep 2013 #47
The Daily Caller too?... SidDithers Sep 2013 #49
Straw man treestar Sep 2013 #52
The Daily Caller? Fucker Carlson's Internet Hate Rag? MADem Sep 2013 #53
But some of the very best DUers use that site as a source. Nye Bevan Sep 2013 #54
Look at the CONTEXT, why doncha? A snarky post about Newt Gingrich and oral sex is not MADem Sep 2013 #56
Ah, so in cases like that it's fine to direct DUers to "Fucker Carlson's internet hate rag". Nye Bevan Sep 2013 #58
When one is making a joke-- "Look, I have a LINK" -- but not when one wants to MADem Sep 2013 #59
Thanks very much for educating me. Nye Bevan Sep 2013 #60
Nice. Union Scribe Sep 2013 #57
You don't get it either, I see. MADem Sep 2013 #61
Pal you got hoisted Union Scribe Sep 2013 #62
If you seriously think that a joke about Gingrich and oral sex is the "same" as "Ron Paul love" MADem Sep 2013 #63
fuck off paul spanone Sep 2013 #55
Even a broken clock is correct twice a day. nt TBF Sep 2013 #64
Waiting now for the framing of the anti war crowd as being aligned with Ron Paul.... L0oniX Sep 2013 #65
To hell with Ron Paul and to hell with war in Syria. They're both equally fuck-headed. Erose999 Sep 2013 #66
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ron Paul: "Reckless and i...»Reply #33