Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)John Bolton: I’d ‘vote no’ on Syria strike [View all]
John Bolton: Id vote no on Syria strike
By LUCY MCCALMONT
If former Ambassador to the UN John Bolton were a member of Congress, he said Tuesday that hed vote against a plan to use military strikes in Syria.
I think if I were a member of Congress I would vote against an authorization to use force here. I dont think it is in Americas interest. I dont think we should in effect take sides in the Syrian conflict, Bolton said on Fox and Friends.
Bolton, who said he would not have referred the matter to Congress, added there isnt enough to convince him that a strike would made an impact in the region.
Theres very little to recommend either side to me, and I think the notion that a limited strike, which is what the President seems to be pursuing, will not create a deterrent effect with respect to either to Syrias use of chemical weapons or more seriously, Irans nuclear weapons program. So all in all, since I dont see any utility to, to the use of military force in Syria in this context, I would vote no.
- more -
http://www.politico.com/story/2013/09/john-bolton-syria-vote-96195.html
By LUCY MCCALMONT
If former Ambassador to the UN John Bolton were a member of Congress, he said Tuesday that hed vote against a plan to use military strikes in Syria.
I think if I were a member of Congress I would vote against an authorization to use force here. I dont think it is in Americas interest. I dont think we should in effect take sides in the Syrian conflict, Bolton said on Fox and Friends.
Bolton, who said he would not have referred the matter to Congress, added there isnt enough to convince him that a strike would made an impact in the region.
Theres very little to recommend either side to me, and I think the notion that a limited strike, which is what the President seems to be pursuing, will not create a deterrent effect with respect to either to Syrias use of chemical weapons or more seriously, Irans nuclear weapons program. So all in all, since I dont see any utility to, to the use of military force in Syria in this context, I would vote no.
- more -
http://www.politico.com/story/2013/09/john-bolton-syria-vote-96195.html
Thus far, Noam Chomsky (http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023586131) Ron Paul (http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023584212) and John Yoo (http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023583127) have weighed in.
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is this an attempt to compare, those who are against military intervention in Syria, to Repugs? nt
boston bean
Sep 2013
#2
It's instructive to read everyone's comments. All of them. Don't you think. Even Bolton.
KittyWampus
Sep 2013
#7
So you're admitting to being "in bed" with at least one "Neocon," and projecting
ProSense
Sep 2013
#37
Haha, It's fun watching your poorly constructed IEDs blow up in your face
whatchamacallit
Sep 2013
#31