Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Photo: Naval Airpower [View all]Clames
(2,038 posts)73. Laughable still.
All that butter spending...
No...that was guns spending. We weren't building cars, people weren't spending (saving of as much earned income as possible was considered very patriotic during this period), and 40% of the GPD was defense spending. And we didn't have a massive transportation infrastructure at the time we mobilized...that came much later. After the war in fact. I don't know what books you have been reading but you need to do much better. I'll even let you take a look at the two footlockers of personal and period documents from my grandfather and great-grandfathers who were a Captain and General (respectively) during the war. One was a personal friend of Patton and I have several of the letter shared between them. Nothing like firsthand source documents ya know...
This is why the Founding Fathers were largely against a large, permanent standing army - it breeds arrogance.
No arrogance there, just a simple fact. Do you honestly believe that the current generation could be mobilized as readily as the generation 70 years past? The willingness to ration and give up on everyday durable goods to support a war effort? Wouldn't even come close to happening today. People like to whine and bitch about their first world problems too much and can't even bear the thought of being deprived of their Starbucks...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
103 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yep, we know doubt have the most advanced military in the world and then we have
teddy51
Feb 2012
#1
One doesn't need to be a militarist to appreciate the beauty of formation flying.
Johnny Rico
Feb 2012
#16
In the 1970's and 1980's we faced an enemy that had (somewhat) comparable power
Hippo_Tron
Feb 2012
#35
Ah, the intoxication of solving the worlds problems with a fleet of killing machines.
sad sally
Feb 2012
#28
So why title it "naval airpower'? Your first concern was the power it projects
muriel_volestrangler
Feb 2012
#57
The title and descriptive text were copied and pasted from the website where
Johnny Rico
Feb 2012
#62
Cool! A tiger cruise has family members on board. It's like open house for sailors kids
Brother Buzz
Feb 2012
#12
The military is the most sacred of our Sacred Cows and loves to strut its $tuff.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Feb 2012
#23
Yes, lets bring our military down to thesame level it was in 1941, #17 in the world.
oneshooter
Feb 2012
#36
Translation: Will come in handy if the GOP ever gets their wet dream of a war with Iran.
ellisonz
Feb 2012
#70
Ok, regarding aircraft carrier battle groups, let's follow President Obama's advice:
Johnny Rico
Feb 2012
#77