Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

HardTimes99

(2,049 posts)

14. Versailles didn't go far enough, imho. The Allies should have broken Germany up into its

Reply to zipplewrath (Reply #9)

Tue Sep 3, 2013, 10:24 AM

Sep 2013

constituent parts and principalities (and maybe partitioned Prussia for good measure).

On second thought, the Allies did do that to the Ottoman Empire and look where we are today. So still thinking this one over.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

32 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Should the US have gotten involved in Europe in WWI? [View all] XemaSab Sep 2013 OP

We had no choice after Germany declared war on us DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2013 #1

The question was about World War I. thucythucy Sep 2013 #3

Too early in the morning DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2013 #4

I know the feeling. thucythucy Sep 2013 #5

The treaty of Versailles zipplewrath Sep 2013 #9

Versailles didn't go far enough, imho. The Allies should have broken Germany up into its HardTimes99 Sep 2013 #14

The Treaty of Versailles' onerous provisions LibertyLover Sep 2013 #29

The sinking of 4 US ships within a one-month period Art_from_Ark Sep 2013 #15

By that point, though, weren't we already in de facto violation of the HardTimes99 Sep 2013 #19

Yes, and on the side of the Germans. Savannahmann Sep 2013 #22

But if you buy into the isolationist position, we wouldn't have been supplying the UK with arms.... brooklynite Sep 2013 #16

I could have sworn we did this one already. el_bryanto Sep 2013 #2

When I was a teen, I spoke to an actual WW1 vet who emphatically said no. lumberjack_jeff Sep 2013 #6

My paternal grandfather served there and he said the novel and subsequent film HardTimes99 Sep 2013 #17

At what point? zipplewrath Sep 2013 #7

It was sold as the war to end all wars. It was sold as a war to create lasting peace. Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #8

chickens jakeXT Sep 2013 #10

OMG! Thatt was hilarious. Arctic Dave Sep 2013 #20

They declared war on US JustAnotherGen Sep 2013 #11

Wrong war. The question and the poll are about World War I (1913-1917).... Rowdyboy Sep 2013 #12

Ahh JustAnotherGen Sep 2013 #26

Democratic Socialist here. I'm going to cast my lot with Eugene Debs on this one and say HardTimes99 Sep 2013 #13

Multi Tasking for me JustAnotherGen Sep 2013 #27

Well, our involvement did prevent WWII... hey, wait a minute! cthulu2016 Sep 2013 #18

Wille McBride zipplewrath Sep 2013 #24

Honestly I'm ashamed to admit Bradical79 Sep 2013 #21

Masters Thesis zipplewrath Sep 2013 #25

The Hundred Years War: Necessity Or Needless Bloodshed? (nt) Paladin Sep 2013 #23

Second JustAnotherGen Sep 2013 #28

Given all the WWI/WWII confusion, methinks your poll results are contaminated. reformist2 Sep 2013 #30

I voted yes, but Ghandi has a quote that asks if any more would have died if we had just stayed out jwirr Sep 2013 #31

In the end we were sucked into the war.... Historic NY Sep 2013 #32