General Discussion

Supersedeas

(20,630 posts)

22. better to be anonymous

Reply to Octafish (Reply #7)

Tue Sep 3, 2013, 11:24 AM

Sep 2013

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

144 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

New York Times Deletes This Paragraph In Which White House Says AIPAC Is Key To War [View all] n2doc Sep 2013 OP

More and more it appears this push for war has nothing to do with chemical weapons... last1standing Sep 2013 #1

What "war"? The Syrian Civil War is pretty complex as is the involvement of Russia, Iran, the USA KittyWampus Sep 2013 #15

It hasn't been proven that Assad used chemical weapons. Fantastic Anarchist Sep 2013 #20

It's very likely that the rebels used chemical weapons on civilians as well. last1standing Sep 2013 #21

The US government needs to prove Assad ordered the attack first. ocpagu Sep 2013 #63

Assad didn't do it. Enthusiast Sep 2013 #123

Have you seen something that proves Assad is responsible for this? Global press reports sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #125

What aipac wants, it gets! pocoloco Sep 2013 #33

"because Hitler" isn't even an appeal to emotion: they've fallen one step beyond that MisterP Sep 2013 #36

Never has & if it was truly about morality... Rockyj Sep 2013 #109

The Chair of the Sen. Foreign Relations Comm will chair Syria war hearings, is a top-tier AIPAC leveymg Sep 2013 #2

A shit-load of money that AIPAC invests because they are Ninga Sep 2013 #8

both Richard Burr and Kay Hagan are on this list Supersedeas Sep 2013 #24

This shows how fucked up this country has gotten - chaching!! polichick Sep 2013 #27

The Senate is beholden to them. We need publicly financed elections badly. JRLeft Sep 2013 #39

Lobbyists for foreign countries should be banned from contributing to US politicians, Ocelot Sep 2013 #50

AIPAC is American leftynyc Sep 2013 #58

Yes. They need to start an AMERICAN lobby of their own Ocelot Sep 2013 #61

THEY ARE AMERICAN leftynyc Sep 2013 #70

They are spies & criminals acting on behalf of a foreign government Ocelot Sep 2013 #84

They were FIRED by AIPAC leftynyc Sep 2013 #87

Fired to save face for AIPAC Ocelot Sep 2013 #90

Oh - is that how it works? leftynyc Sep 2013 #94

This isn't about Snowden Ocelot Sep 2013 #103

It is the same leftynyc Sep 2013 #126

This message was self-deleted by its author Ocelot Sep 2013 #138

If you had a brain, Scarecrow Ocelot Sep 2013 #139

They were fired only after they were indicted, and AIPAC members then picked up their bills. leveymg Sep 2013 #93

So what? leftynyc Sep 2013 #95

Nobody says every AIPAC member is a spy, just that it needs to be registered as a foreign agent. leveymg Sep 2013 #100

It's Americans lobbying for leftynyc Sep 2013 #127

Why carry water for these extremist right wingers? DisgustipatedinCA Sep 2013 #113

Because they aren't leftynyc Sep 2013 #128

It's perhaps relevant to observe that this subject receives little mention Ghost Dog Sep 2013 #106

51st State? That would be Airstrip One, Ghost Dog Sep 2013 #105

So was the German-American Bund. But, they're still an unregistered foreign lobbying and agent for leveymg Sep 2013 #62

Who are the ten senators not on the list? reusrename Sep 2013 #72

How much did John Kerry get during his tenure? countmyvote4real Sep 2013 #112

K & R & AzDar Sep 2013 #3

Ah...the wonders of search engines on the "Internets"...times have changed for sure. Ninga Sep 2013 #4

It was from an unidentified source so removing it doesn't point to much. randome Sep 2013 #5

Invalid point. DisgustipatedinCA Sep 2013 #114

Note to the Times:. .NOTHING ever really annabanana Sep 2013 #6

Odd how what's news can change. Octafish Sep 2013 #7

I was thinking the same thing. AIPAC = PNAC LuvNewcastle Sep 2013 #10

Yes, those two warmongering factions are aligned... CoffeeCat Sep 2013 #42

People don't mention that enough. LuvNewcastle Sep 2013 #75

Also from NYT: redline was inserted into Obama's Aug. '12 speech under threat by Israel leveymg Sep 2013 #11

Google "Putin and Red Line". You should get a relevant amount of searches. KittyWampus Sep 2013 #12

What is "a relevant amount of searches?" RU saying Russia forced the redlines and Israel didn't? leveymg Sep 2013 #13

What about this well known poisoner? Should we do something? AikidoSoul Sep 2013 #37

Love that! n/t cui bono Sep 2013 #97

Ah, so the story morphs ever more. lark Sep 2013 #45

I have long thought that 2naSalit Sep 2013 #67

Ding, ding - we have a winner!! lark Sep 2013 #101

Thankyou. Ghost Dog Sep 2013 #107

Excellent post - eom dreamnightwind Sep 2013 #118

Oddly Lindsey Graham get's much less that the top contributions KoKo Sep 2013 #68

Although an avid reader of the paper, I refer to it as the "Shady Lady" since the Iraq invasion. nt adirondacker Sep 2013 #16

Weren't Wilkes and Foggo besties with AIPAC? hootinholler Sep 2013 #17

Sibel Edmonds spoke quite a bit on AIPAC Oilwellian Sep 2013 #51

Edmonds is a con artist Vinnie From Indy Sep 2013 #66

You seem to know little or nothing about her. leveymg Sep 2013 #83

She has conned everyone that has sent her money. Vinnie From Indy Sep 2013 #86

No, I conclude from your libel that you're an internet hitman who has it in for her. leveymg Sep 2013 #89

Please feel free to believe the Sibel Edmonds myth if that is your pleasure. Vinnie From Indy Sep 2013 #102

I was familiar with that story about Schakowsky dreamnightwind Sep 2013 #119

better to be anonymous Supersedeas Sep 2013 #22

It's all about journalistic integrity Supersedeas Sep 2013 #130

''Integrity? Integrity is for paupers!'' -- Tim Russert, reportedly. Octafish Sep 2013 #136

K&R Hell Hath No Fury Sep 2013 #9

K&R Segami Sep 2013 #14

We are AIPAC's yo yo IMO. n/t L0oniX Sep 2013 #18

Iran being "emboldened in the future to attack Israel" ... Fantastic Anarchist Sep 2013 #19

Well, the Bible says... CoffeeCat Sep 2013 #46

Everyone sneezes. Fantastic Anarchist Sep 2013 #60

K&R woo me with science Sep 2013 #23

I'm shocked! joeybee12 Sep 2013 #25

I should have known. KamaAina Sep 2013 #26

"The Joooos control everything" bullshit... SidDithers Sep 2013 #28

Anti-Semitic? What makes it anti-Semitic to say AIPAC wants somethng? polichick Sep 2013 #30

Persecuted much? go west young man Sep 2013 #41

Did you mean to post that to me? polichick Sep 2013 #44

I hope not. nm rhett o rick Sep 2013 #49

Thanks - it wouldn't make sense... polichick Sep 2013 #55

Sorry about that. go west young man Sep 2013 #120

No worries. polichick Sep 2013 #134

You do realize AIPAC is American Jews, don't you? leftynyc Sep 2013 #59

luckily the Syrian rebels we support will do that for us, they like to eat livers too Dragonfli Sep 2013 #69

Actually each and every post of leftynyc Sep 2013 #71

They lobby for foreign interests, I'd say that makes them a foreign lobby. /nt Dragonfli Sep 2013 #73

So everybody gets a say - everybody leftynyc Sep 2013 #74

Not at all, I just feel that lobbying for foreign interests does not belong in our government. Dragonfli Sep 2013 #76

Don't put words in my mouth leftynyc Sep 2013 #77

You can advocate for whatever foreign country who's interests you favor over ours - I don't care Dragonfli Sep 2013 #85

We'll forget the implication that I'm leftynyc Sep 2013 #88

The first Amendement does not state that foreign countries can buy US policy Dragonfli Sep 2013 #91

So much stupid and so leftynyc Sep 2013 #92

Lobbying by foreign countries!!!! Not lobbying (talk about stupid) Dragonfli Sep 2013 #99

I'm with you, Dragonfli....nt Enthusiast Sep 2013 #124

LOL - this is ridiculous leftynyc Sep 2013 #129

LOL sure, sure, I suppose Iran should also have registered lobbyists Dragonfli Sep 2013 #131

Uh - Americans spied on Americans leftynyc Sep 2013 #132

Of course, AIPAC is all about spying ON America FOR America, they barely acknowledge Israel exists Dragonfli Sep 2013 #137

Exactly! ctsnowman Sep 2013 #133

A minority of American Jews eridani Sep 2013 #78

Your post is really leftynyc Sep 2013 #79

You've got evidence that AIPAC represents majority American Jewish opinion? eridani Sep 2013 #81

If you think that was the leftynyc Sep 2013 #82

I maintain that it's funnier if you spell it "Jooz" Orrex Sep 2013 #38

I think you're right... SidDithers Sep 2013 #43

I hate to burst your bubble Ocelot Sep 2013 #47

Quite the complex you've got there n/t whatchamacallit Sep 2013 #104

Hey Dithers. You've made an accusation of anti-semitism. Get busy explaining yourself. DisgustipatedinCA Sep 2013 #115

Wow = what a sell out by the NYT Berlum Sep 2013 #29

As my name suggests, I feel the same. n/t DisgustipatedinCA Sep 2013 #116

No surprise moondust Sep 2013 #31

Both sides in this civil war are our enemies. At least one side has used nerve gas The Second Stone Sep 2013 #32

That's Neocon speak. The Stranger Sep 2013 #35

and that's how a hegemony works: when its terminology is adopted even by its opponents MisterP Sep 2013 #48

"and, even if they were, that does not mean there can be no appropriate response." rhett o rick Sep 2013 #53

Weak comparison. "Bush" and "NeoCon" are trump card attempts that should be avoided. Dash87 Sep 2013 #54

The truth slips through from time to time Ocelot Sep 2013 #34

Every now and then, they accidentally tell the truth kenny blankenship Sep 2013 #40

K&R forestpath Sep 2013 #52

Go figure libodem Sep 2013 #56

War For Profit. blkmusclmachine Sep 2013 #57

Coxkroaches that can't stand the light.... HooptieWagon Sep 2013 #64

Jewish leaders wary as White House seeks support for Syria vote in Congress Jefferson23 Sep 2013 #65

Sick and tired of AIPAC claiming to represent all American Jews? eridani Sep 2013 #80

+1, thanks. Glad someone mentioned them. Mc Mike Sep 2013 #135

Here's a screenshot of Google search showing the deleted paragraph: Faryn Balyncd Sep 2013 #96

K&r avaistheone1 Sep 2013 #98

update from the Times Jesus Malverde Sep 2013 #108

Nice contribution to this discussion dreamnightwind Sep 2013 #121

Dear God in Heaven: is this all about doing AIPAC's bidding? Is this what this war is all about? indepat Sep 2013 #110

When Susan Rice said "we have no anticipation" that Congress will vote against action against Syria psychopomp Sep 2013 #111

The NYT also deleted embarrassing info snot Sep 2013 #117

Interesting dreamnightwind Sep 2013 #140

Just my email to my friend, which I could have faked, though I didn't. snot Sep 2013 #141

Thanks for taking the time to post that, dreamnightwind Sep 2013 #143

Agreed. snot Sep 2013 #144

Holy shit! Enthusiast Sep 2013 #122

Stuck between AIPAC and the Koch Brothers Generic Other Sep 2013 #142