Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Historic NY

(39,897 posts)
32. In the end we were sucked into the war....
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 11:31 AM
Sep 2013

Last edited Tue Sep 3, 2013, 02:19 PM - Edit history (1)

which had been going on "tit for tat", from 1912 onward. The crescendo was the assassination of Arch Duke Ferdinand and his wife in July 1914 increased the echoes of war.

European politics and Imperialism and the arms race were part of the root cause along with petty greivances from the 1880 period. Pretty much it seems everyone hated each other.

All out submarine warfare against our commercial ships eventually brought Wilson to the table, once neutrality failed. The final blame was the Lusitania, but it was in the works long before that... as groups worked to gin up our entry. Wilson finally caved when he saw Germany's Imperialistic goals threaten not only the world but US interests. Nothing stood in their way with the Russian Revolution turning out the Czar. The anti-warists slowly evolved to see that it was a moral threat and slowly withdrew their opposition. Wilson finally declared was on the German Empire in 1917.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

We had no choice after Germany declared war on us DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2013 #1
The question was about World War I. thucythucy Sep 2013 #3
Too early in the morning DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2013 #4
I know the feeling. thucythucy Sep 2013 #5
The treaty of Versailles zipplewrath Sep 2013 #9
Versailles didn't go far enough, imho. The Allies should have broken Germany up into its HardTimes99 Sep 2013 #14
The Treaty of Versailles' onerous provisions LibertyLover Sep 2013 #29
The sinking of 4 US ships within a one-month period Art_from_Ark Sep 2013 #15
By that point, though, weren't we already in de facto violation of the HardTimes99 Sep 2013 #19
Yes, and on the side of the Germans. Savannahmann Sep 2013 #22
But if you buy into the isolationist position, we wouldn't have been supplying the UK with arms.... brooklynite Sep 2013 #16
I could have sworn we did this one already. el_bryanto Sep 2013 #2
When I was a teen, I spoke to an actual WW1 vet who emphatically said no. lumberjack_jeff Sep 2013 #6
My paternal grandfather served there and he said the novel and subsequent film HardTimes99 Sep 2013 #17
At what point? zipplewrath Sep 2013 #7
It was sold as the war to end all wars. It was sold as a war to create lasting peace. Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #8
chickens jakeXT Sep 2013 #10
OMG! Thatt was hilarious. Arctic Dave Sep 2013 #20
They declared war on US JustAnotherGen Sep 2013 #11
Wrong war. The question and the poll are about World War I (1913-1917).... Rowdyboy Sep 2013 #12
Ahh JustAnotherGen Sep 2013 #26
Democratic Socialist here. I'm going to cast my lot with Eugene Debs on this one and say HardTimes99 Sep 2013 #13
Multi Tasking for me JustAnotherGen Sep 2013 #27
Well, our involvement did prevent WWII... hey, wait a minute! cthulu2016 Sep 2013 #18
Wille McBride zipplewrath Sep 2013 #24
Honestly I'm ashamed to admit Bradical79 Sep 2013 #21
Masters Thesis zipplewrath Sep 2013 #25
The Hundred Years War: Necessity Or Needless Bloodshed? (nt) Paladin Sep 2013 #23
Second JustAnotherGen Sep 2013 #28
Given all the WWI/WWII confusion, methinks your poll results are contaminated. reformist2 Sep 2013 #30
I voted yes, but Ghandi has a quote that asks if any more would have died if we had just stayed out jwirr Sep 2013 #31
In the end we were sucked into the war.... Historic NY Sep 2013 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should the US have gotten...»Reply #32