General Discussion

tazkcmo

(7,419 posts)

31. Nor are they the only ones

Tue Sep 3, 2013, 04:20 PM

Sep 2013

with nut jobs in charge of it. We got a few of those ourselves.

I have yet to see anyone disagree about Assad being a creep that needs to pay for what he has done (if indeed it's proven he did and I'll not take our governments word for it. I'll wait for a body of folks that won't make money by dropping bombs) yet I see you time and time again suggest that by not bombing Syria to the Stone Age we somehow don't care or think Assad is evil. What I'm asking for is for our leaders to consider ALL the possibilities and if military action in WHAT EVER form it takes is indeed the ONLY solution. In addition, it appears that actual goal is regime change so who is going to replace him? You have to think further than Boom.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

46 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How much do we spend out of our budget for military/defense? [View all] darkangel218 Sep 2013 OP

Won't change anything on the ground wise either. tazkcmo Sep 2013 #1

What happend wasnt a genocide?? then what was it?? darkangel218 Sep 2013 #2

It was a horrific and brutal attack. tazkcmo Sep 2013 #3

There is no other solution. darkangel218 Sep 2013 #4

None? tazkcmo Sep 2013 #5

Yah, go them. darkangel218 Sep 2013 #7

OK tazkcmo Sep 2013 #9

The world cant afford a nut job running around dropping WMDs. darkangel218 Sep 2013 #12

That's the most sensible thing I've seen you post tazkcmo Sep 2013 #17

Not deja vu, nothing to do with prior conflicts. darkangel218 Sep 2013 #20

I doubt you're sorry. tazkcmo Sep 2013 #26

Thats your opinion. Because i was against both wars. darkangel218 Sep 2013 #28

I don't have to say it. tazkcmo Sep 2013 #33

Oh yah, join the military because you agree with POTUS decision!! darkangel218 Sep 2013 #35

And what do you have? ocpagu Sep 2013 #38

No tazkcmo Sep 2013 #39

Im not starting anything, the administration is. darkangel218 Sep 2013 #41

You're on this message board cheerleading. tazkcmo Sep 2013 #43

You think that youre going to win this aegument by making things up? darkangel218 Sep 2013 #45

Here is post 7. Yours. tazkcmo Sep 2013 #46

But Saddam gassed his open people too tazkcmo Sep 2013 #44

"The world cant afford a nut job running around dropping WMDs" ocpagu Sep 2013 #22

So what?? we are not the only ones having a nuclear arsenal. darkangel218 Sep 2013 #25

You are the only ones spreading them. n/t ocpagu Sep 2013 #29

Nor are they the only ones tazkcmo Sep 2013 #31

23% hack89 Sep 2013 #6

. darkangel218 Sep 2013 #8

That is in line with what I posted. nt hack89 Sep 2013 #11

Oh, yes, why letting them kill each other if we can save both sides the effort with missiles, right? ocpagu Sep 2013 #10

Does the use of weapons of mass destruction mean nothing to you? lol! darkangel218 Sep 2013 #13

Yes, it does. ocpagu Sep 2013 #15

Excuse me, Syria has used chemical weapons , which ARE WMD!! darkangel218 Sep 2013 #16

Yes, sir, I DO think Germany should abstain to get involved in certain situations... ocpagu Sep 2013 #18

Im a female. darkangel218 Sep 2013 #21

Then, lady. ocpagu Sep 2013 #24

The best i can come up with to your rethoric. darkangel218 Sep 2013 #27

NOT in the past. IN THE PRESENT. n/t ocpagu Sep 2013 #32

Why are you LOLing? tazkcmo Sep 2013 #40

Germany was defeated, it's leaders punished and country ripped in half. tazkcmo Sep 2013 #19

Open war is not ok with me. darkangel218 Sep 2013 #23

First, you need to prove Assad is guilty, and you haven't so far. ocpagu Sep 2013 #34

Guilt Shmilt. tazkcmo Sep 2013 #37

Thewre you go again tazkcmo Sep 2013 #36

Open war is ok with you tazkcmo Sep 2013 #42

It's about WHO does the killing. tazkcmo Sep 2013 #14

Depends on how you calculate it, and what you include. PDJane Sep 2013 #30