Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pampango

(24,692 posts)
49. The Center for American Progress will be surprised at your analysis. Do you have a source?
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 04:49 PM
Sep 2013


http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/security/report/2013/05/14/63221/the-structure-and-organization-of-the-syrian-opposition/

Saraqeb is a city of two revolutions -- one against the Syrian government and the other against the "Islamiyeen," the jihadists and al-Qaeda linked fighters. Because of Saraqeb's size and strategic location at the junction of two major highways going to Aleppo, both Dawlat al-Islamiyya fil Iraq wal Sham (Islamic State of Iraq and Sham (ISIS)) and Jubhat al-Nusra converged to control it. Yet where these fighters had succeeded in controlling smaller towns like Binish, they were met with resistance in Saraqeb.

Through that interaction and others that I witnessed, it was clear that the Syrians did not welcome these foreign Islamists and viewed them as an evil, only second to the Syrian Regime and its allies. Indeed many Syrians suspected that there was a partnership of sorts between the "Islamiyeen" and the Regime. "While the Regime constantly targets FSA military posts," explained a Syrian man from Kafranbel, "it never targets the Jubhat or Dawlat's military posts."

None of the Syrians I spoke with knew the exact nature of the relationship between the Regime and the "Islamiyeen" but they strongly believed the Regime wanted them in Syria. "They substantiate the government's story that it is fighting terrorists," explained one man. "But rather than targeting them, the government shells us, its own people." The "Islamiyeen" also became the international community's scapegoat for declining to intervene in Syria or provide weapons to the moderate FSA. "What, the Islamiyeen are only about 9,000 fighters while the FSA are about 100,000 fighters!" told me the same man. "Yet America only talks about the Islamiyeen as if everyone else in Syria doesn't count." And of course, the "Islamiyeen" have little loyalties to the Syrians in the "liberated" areas and justify their extremist views and harsh dealings on archaic notions of religion and religious statehood. The Dawlat (ISIS) kidnapped a young Syrian videographer and activist I had met a day earlier because he wore a Metallica shirt and expressed irreligious sentiments in his private videos. To this day, his whereabouts remain unknown.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/reem-salahi/two-and-a-half-years-late_b_3810796.html

"Yet America only talks about the Islamiyeen as if everyone else in Syria doesn't count."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

OH FUCK!!! this is not good bigdarryl Sep 2013 #1
Guess we're at war with Eastasia now. NuclearDem Sep 2013 #2
Yup. Psyops max, now. Ghost Dog Sep 2013 #3
So the new standard if someone... dennis4868 Sep 2013 #4
Once again..."how do you know where to go, if you don't know where we've been?" Ninga Sep 2013 #5
Your title is inaccuarate; UK sold potassium and sodium fluoride, not 'chem weapons' muriel_volestrangler Sep 2013 #6
But they didn't sell them, as you later pointed out Turborama Sep 2013 #53
Except he didn't label Assad "Hitler" tridim Sep 2013 #7
He says a lot of things blazeKing Sep 2013 #11
Sorry, your argument is worthless cthulu2016 Sep 2013 #12
Then maybe you should create your own hyperbolic post. tridim Sep 2013 #16
+ 1000 nt Cryptoad Sep 2013 #26
Assad is not a nice guy. Like all dictators for life, he's a bastard Warpy Sep 2013 #8
Assad is not "better than any of the people fighting against him". The vast majority of war crimes pampango Sep 2013 #15
Per NATO, Assad has the support of 70% of the population of Syria KurtNYC Sep 2013 #19
On what date...... NCTraveler Sep 2013 #41
There are no secular brigades of fighters. Jesus Malverde Sep 2013 #37
The Center for American Progress will be surprised at your analysis. Do you have a source? pampango Sep 2013 #49
If they overthrow him there will be a power vacuum Warpy Sep 2013 #48
"It's better to force a bad established government to make concessions." Agreed. How do you pampango Sep 2013 #51
One of the great lessons of history Warpy Sep 2013 #52
+ a million truebluegreen Sep 2013 #54
^^^this^^^ progressoid Sep 2013 #59
nothing pisses washington off like a friend straying. unblock Sep 2013 #9
I would be surprised if British and French officials did not have dinner with Hitler prior to 1939. pampango Sep 2013 #10
Nor would they be ashamed of it - it is normal statescraft karynnj Sep 2013 #17
How is this that much different than say, FDR sitting down with Stalin? rbixby Sep 2013 #13
John and Teresa Kerry were meeting the Assads as part of a diplomatic effort karynnj Sep 2013 #14
Reminds me of the RW mocking Pelosi for going to Syria. ProSense Sep 2013 #18
Very well said. Old and In the Way Sep 2013 #20
Nailed it... SidDithers Sep 2013 #24
Oh that would be too bad. Cha Sep 2013 #57
+1 iamthebandfanman Sep 2013 #25
+1 NCTraveler Sep 2013 #33
It's willful laziness that breeds contagious ignorance. It also weakens Cha Sep 2013 #58
Recommend jsr Sep 2013 #21
so we can use white phosphorus matt in france Sep 2013 #22
Oh now don't you know tblue Sep 2013 #39
Fuck you, John Kerry. RevStPatrick Sep 2013 #23
Idiotic karynnj Sep 2013 #34
Meh... RevStPatrick Sep 2013 #38
"Assad is evil, but this has nothing to do with chemical weapons." ProSense Sep 2013 #44
And another outrage widget hits the shop floor... SidDithers Sep 2013 #27
This has nothing to do with chemical weapons and everything to do with corporate greed. JRLeft Sep 2013 #28
Sec of State is a position of diplomacy, and this was before civil war. Avalux Sep 2013 #29
K&R Ocelot Sep 2013 #30
I don't get it. Skinner Sep 2013 #31
The British did not sell them chemical weapons. NCTraveler Sep 2013 #32
Kicking because everyone needs to see..... NCTraveler Sep 2013 #35
what a load of bullshit... madrchsod Sep 2013 #36
It's just like the pictures of Rumsfeld with Saddam NightWatcher Sep 2013 #40
No it isn't ProSense Sep 2013 #42
Time for all the rich people who matter in the world to get richer. nt valerief Sep 2013 #43
So now trying diplomacy first is bad? NYC Liberal Sep 2013 #45
Kerry continues to disappoint. DirkGently Sep 2013 #46
Why does that remind me of this? HardTimes99 Sep 2013 #47
Let's look at the chemicals sold to Syria by the Brits. MineralMan Sep 2013 #50
Ouch!!! malaise Sep 2013 #55
Who cares about the dinner? treestar Sep 2013 #56
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Kerry Labels Assad ‘HITLE...»Reply #49