Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: You know the hysterics regarding Syria are truly disrespectful [View all]Oakenshield
(628 posts)136. It's the latest trend by the third wayers around here.
First they accused liberal critics of the Obama administration of being Paulbots, now they accuse of us of being fans of a mass murdering tyrant. I might be offended if not for the fact the accusation is so utterly uninspired.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
159 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
We'll call it a war when Syria or its allies sink one or more of our ships (as she
HardTimes99
Sep 2013
#119
Right. They certainly didn't volunteer for getting gassed and will not volunteer for any future
lumpy
Sep 2013
#45
If it's really as minimal as you say, it will have a minimal impact on Syria.
reformist2
Sep 2013
#7
LOL, you realize that soldiers are required to fire these missiles? Soldiers that are away...
Logical
Sep 2013
#9
if we just remove his chemical weapons....that is not necessarily a war...
VanillaRhapsody
Sep 2013
#155
so if Iran were to fire 100+ cruise missiles at the United States - that would not be war?
Douglas Carpenter
Sep 2013
#14
No one in The USA was saying we were 'at war' with Libya when Obama intervened over in Libya
Tx4obama
Sep 2013
#23
So when France helped us in the Revolutionary war...France then declared war on Great Britain?
VanillaRhapsody
Sep 2013
#110
Yes, there was a formal state of war between Britain and France (and Spain, for that matter)
muriel_volestrangler
Sep 2013
#139
Thank you for your service Pasto76....but don't expect an apology from most on this thread.
pkdu
Sep 2013
#112
exactly could you imagine if American command and control centers on U.S. soil were hit by 100+
Douglas Carpenter
Sep 2013
#125
My experience is protesting wars. No, I don't automatically respect you for serving in
cali
Sep 2013
#140
I imagine the people on the receiving end of our missile strikes would love to trade
MNBrewer
Sep 2013
#61
I respect your service but that doesn't mean you get to frame the debate.
last1standing
Sep 2013
#66
Agreed. And remember, its the knee jerk reactionist who are always the loudest.....
MzShellG
Sep 2013
#98
The administation has been evaluating and gathering intelligence on this situation for a while.....
MzShellG
Sep 2013
#111
Youre intitled to your opinion. I can respect that we will just have to disagree....
MzShellG
Sep 2013
#117
Using the military to carry out foreign policy is war. When innocents die by our bombs, it is war.
morningfog
Sep 2013
#103
I'm a veteran with an Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal. You DON'T speak for me.
cherokeeprogressive
Sep 2013
#109
Interesting how the Syrian innocent civilians who'll die do not appear in your equation.
ocpagu
Sep 2013
#116
We have barely begun to be disrespectful about this dishonest crap yet , Sir. nt
bemildred
Sep 2013
#141
By this standard Germany was not at "war" with England during the Battle of Britain. nt
Demo_Chris
Sep 2013
#150