Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Photo: Naval Airpower [View all]ellisonz
(27,776 posts)87. Keep drowning.
If World War II had not happened, and the U.S. had kept up the New Deal instead of backsliding in 1937, the economy would have rebounded just the same. Stimulus works!
That massive infrastructure DID NOT exist before the war as I correctly stated. It was built during, and in most part finished, after the war.
So your logic is that the U.S. didn't have an extensive highway system until the Interstate Highway System?

United states Numbered Highways

1941
How did we ever beat the Nazis and the Empire of Japan without the Interstate Highway System?
Sure, just ignore the lagging time period between when investment is made and work is actually completed.
So all the work that was done in the New Deal was insignificant to World War II mobilization?
As for the rest of your swill you have not, nor will not, ever find a place where I even hinted that I want to spend money on guns in preference to butter. I want balanced, reasonable spending on both. Your ignorance on the function of our military as it relates to current infrastructure, environmental stewardship, and medical support is astounding. Cutting the military force in half is stupid, myopic, and beyond what anyone with even a basic understanding of current economic policies would consider. Pathetic arguments from someone who considers himself having an academic pedigree in history....
The time is fast approaching to make such hard choices. Wait who are we fighting that justifies doubling our defense expenditures over the last decade? We gotta be ready to fight those ChiComms, it's going to take all the dollars we can get!

Keep showing that anger, it really shows your true colors. You've earned it:

Oooh I'm scared now
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
103 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yep, we know doubt have the most advanced military in the world and then we have
teddy51
Feb 2012
#1
One doesn't need to be a militarist to appreciate the beauty of formation flying.
Johnny Rico
Feb 2012
#16
In the 1970's and 1980's we faced an enemy that had (somewhat) comparable power
Hippo_Tron
Feb 2012
#35
Ah, the intoxication of solving the worlds problems with a fleet of killing machines.
sad sally
Feb 2012
#28
So why title it "naval airpower'? Your first concern was the power it projects
muriel_volestrangler
Feb 2012
#57
The title and descriptive text were copied and pasted from the website where
Johnny Rico
Feb 2012
#62
Cool! A tiger cruise has family members on board. It's like open house for sailors kids
Brother Buzz
Feb 2012
#12
The military is the most sacred of our Sacred Cows and loves to strut its $tuff.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Feb 2012
#23
Yes, lets bring our military down to thesame level it was in 1941, #17 in the world.
oneshooter
Feb 2012
#36
Translation: Will come in handy if the GOP ever gets their wet dream of a war with Iran.
ellisonz
Feb 2012
#70
Ok, regarding aircraft carrier battle groups, let's follow President Obama's advice:
Johnny Rico
Feb 2012
#77