Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)What happens if Assad shoots back? [View all]
It occurred to me this morning that not once has anyone said what we will do if Syria shoots back. A C-Span caller asked the question this morning about what we will do if one of our planes gets shot down and of course there is no answer but it was a real revelation to recall that the question has simply been ignored.
Have we ever entered into a conflict that did not excelate? A second question comes to mind as well, and this one comes from looking at the pattern of movement of refugees out of Syria. They are mostly going north and south with fewer to the east, but it appears none are moving to the west. Has Israel opened its border with Syria to allow refugees to escape Assad?
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Incirlik Air Base, a USAF base in Turkey, is within range of more than a thousand Syrian missiles.
Xithras
Sep 2013
#11
I know, and Assad will probably make that call depending on the severity of our attack.
Xithras
Sep 2013
#25
Well, there's long been a question about how much control he actually has over the military
Xithras
Sep 2013
#38
But that would be "boots on the ground" which Obama has promised us will not happen. Obama wants you
Erose999
Sep 2013
#42
Given the mutual-defense pact between Syria and Iran, any attack by us on Syria would be viewed as
HardTimes99
Sep 2013
#40
While they are missiles and not planes, you postulate something that worries my slightly...
Javaman
Sep 2013
#3
How does that work if you're just staging a drive-by missile shooting to impress the press?
Nuclear Unicorn
Sep 2013
#33
Well then Obama would have been right to attack because he's an unstable maniac?
Cali_Democrat
Sep 2013
#23
Even if there aren't air strikes, Assad still has some very shiny anti-ship missiles.
NuclearDem
Sep 2013
#6
They won't, they will just move the goal posts, again. They demand to know what we expect the
sabrina 1
Sep 2013
#15
Were it not for the seriousness of the issues at hand, that indeed would be well worth
HardTimes99
Sep 2013
#43
I agree with you on the battle. The military has tested robotic drone attack aircraft and bombers
bluestate10
Sep 2013
#18
Good thing you used the sarcasm emoticon. I swear it seems like half the people posting here believe
HardTimes99
Sep 2013
#45
We'll put on our best performance of acting shocked: How dare he hit back while we're punishing him?
reformist2
Sep 2013
#16
I don't think we'll send jets over Syria. Our submarines will launch missiles.
KittyWampus
Sep 2013
#19
that's not supposed to happen: in fact, in every war we've been in it wasn't supposed to happen
MisterP
Sep 2013
#26
Why is it unwise for Syria to escalate, but perfectly rational for us to escalate? - nt
HardTimes99
Sep 2013
#46
Syria will be fully entitled to attack our ships and other assets before we fire any
HardTimes99
Sep 2013
#34
Thanks for the detail and analysis. I don't have cable so rely mostly on what
HardTimes99
Sep 2013
#39
If? More like when.... But I think that was the whole point from the start n/t
Taitertots
Sep 2013
#36