Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

that would do far more than prevent bombs… the only way Assad's forces can move supplies is jet > KittyWampus Sep 2013 #1
Wouldn't that cause both jets and bombs to drop on their people? last1standing Sep 2013 #2
presumably poster means bombing jets on airfields. Or bombing airfields so jets have nowhere to land KittyWampus Sep 2013 #4
Yes! pnwmom Sep 2013 #8
I meant on parked fighter jets. Sorry. n/t pnwmom Sep 2013 #9
Nope. I should have asked for clarification. last1standing Sep 2013 #10
I thought we couldn't take out chemical weapons storage facilities without exposing pnwmom Sep 2013 #12
We wouldn't. That's why this isn't such a simple operation. last1standing Sep 2013 #13
then why have we been training the rebels on how to control and secure chemical weapons already? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #15
Why indeed? last1standing Sep 2013 #16
We know that how? Because a minority of them are Al Queda? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #17
Ok then. I see you don't want to have a serious conversation. last1standing Sep 2013 #19
OHHHH I get it.... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #20
It's unacceptable to claim there's no danger in training these groups. last1standing Sep 2013 #21
who the hell ever said that? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #22
Now we agree on something. last1standing Sep 2013 #24
Because the rebels control territory where chemical weapons are stored? pnwmom Sep 2013 #23
Excellent ^^^ point VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #25
So the rebels control the territory where the chemical weapons TM99 Sep 2013 #27
The rebels could be controlling some territory where chemical weapons are stored pnwmom Sep 2013 #30
I am not attacking you personally TM99 Sep 2013 #34
I am completely on the fence, hoping that the UN report might help me off of it. pnwmom Sep 2013 #35
I can agree with the UN report. TM99 Sep 2013 #37
Chemical warfare has been outlawed by an international treaty signed pnwmom Sep 2013 #38
Yes, and so have TM99 Sep 2013 #39
The cluster bomb treaty only covers 83 countries at this point, and the US, China, and Russia pnwmom Sep 2013 #40
I am sorry but this is yet another TM99 Sep 2013 #41
How could the Chemical Weapons Convention have applied to our use of Agent Orange pnwmom Sep 2013 #42
How can the Chemical Weapons Convention TM99 Sep 2013 #43
It is true that that didn't bind them. That doesn't mean that they can use them pnwmom Sep 2013 #44
Nor should it, but TM99 Sep 2013 #45
I am waiting for the UN report. I'd also prefer a UN action or, better yet, pnwmom Sep 2013 #46
Let us all hope TM99 Sep 2013 #47
What I heard on the PBS Newshour BainsBane Sep 2013 #3
it'd also isolate his troops & severely limit their ability to get supplies as rebels control ground KittyWampus Sep 2013 #5
Thanks. n/t pnwmom Sep 2013 #7
But again, we see the holes in this story from day one. TM99 Sep 2013 #28
Good Points...! KoKo Sep 2013 #31
That is what will happen after the Congress passes the 'use of force' resolution Tx4obama Sep 2013 #6
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2013 #11
I think you meant for your comment to go to the person that wrote the OP. Tx4obama Sep 2013 #14
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2013 #18
Well, that's always the issue in these affairs. longship Sep 2013 #26
Sure, but... Savannahmann Sep 2013 #29
BUT the attack with the napalm-type chemical that BURNT folks was dropped from a FIGHTER JET Tx4obama Sep 2013 #48
Why do you think that's not part of the plan? brooklynite Sep 2013 #32
I realize now that it probably is. But the way people around here were talking pnwmom Sep 2013 #33
Quite possible... sarisataka Sep 2013 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is is possible to have a ...»Reply #40