Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)

3. That's not accurate

Reply to leveymg (Original post)

Wed Sep 4, 2013, 04:13 PM

Sep 2013

McCain wanted the prohibition on ground troops removed. That did not happen. In that sense, the resolution was not "crafted to his tastes." Rather, McCain was able to get tougher language introduced as a compromise measure. The full committee kept the prohibition on US ground troops intact, denying McCain's publicly expressed desires of this morning.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

McCrazy voted yes only after tougher Syria war resolution was crafted to his tastes [View all] leveymg Sep 2013 OP

Oh, that's OK. It's not a real war...it's....it's...well....something else. Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2013 #1

Hit me Blue Owl Sep 2013 #2

That's not accurate alcibiades_mystery Sep 2013 #3

You can snarfle, snuff, nitpick, as you like, but it's accurate - what's the difference between leveymg Sep 2013 #10

He didn't get what he publicly stated he wanted alcibiades_mystery Sep 2013 #12

You mean, he didn't get EVERYTHING he wanted. leveymg Sep 2013 #13

McCain wanted boots on the ground...the resolution forbids it...if that's a nitpick, well alcibiades_mystery Sep 2013 #14

He gets regime change, which is what McCain wanted to begin with. It'll take >90 days to get boots leveymg Sep 2013 #15

OK alcibiades_mystery Sep 2013 #16

Senate Panel Votes To Make Regime Change The Goal Of Syria Mission ProSense Sep 2013 #4

Isn't "reversing the situation on the ground" the same as "getting involved in a civil war?" arcane1 Sep 2013 #9

"Changing the momentum on the ground." Jesus, we are opening a bullwinkle428 Sep 2013 #5

That doesn't sound limited to me. What does it take to change momentum given the totality of Assad dkf Sep 2013 #6

Now Obama will be forced to carry it out against his will. Just like spying on US citizens. The Link Sep 2013 #7

Yeah, sucks that he ends up doing so much stuff he really doesn't want to...nt joeybee12 Sep 2013 #11

Dear God in Heaven, save us from ourselves. n/t Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2013 #8