Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
4. Senate Panel Votes To Make Regime Change The Goal Of Syria Mission
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 04:13 PM
Sep 2013
Senate Panel Votes To Make Regime Change The Goal Of Syria Mission

The Senate Foreign Relations Committee adopted by voice vote Wednesday two amendments by Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) to the resolution authorizing military action in Syria that would make it the goal of the mission to "change the moment on the battlefield in Syria."

The two McCain amendments to that effect, co-sponsored by Sen. Chris Coons (D-DE), change the non-binding Statement of Policy in the resolution to say:

It is the policy of the United States to change the momentum on the battlefield in Syria so as to create favorable conditions for a negotiated settlement that ends the conflict and leads to a democratic government in Syria.

The amendments point to degrading the Assad regime's chemical weapons capability and the arming of Syrian opposition as means of reversing the situation on the ground in Syria, where the Assad regime is generally considered to be winning.

The language appears to address McCain's concerns about the resolution that he voiced Wednesday morning when he said he would not support the resolution as it was then written. McCain has consistently said he supports further U.S. intervention in Syria to topple Assad.

The White House has repeatedly said that its goal with military intervention is not "regime change."

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/mccain-amendment-us-policy-to-change-momentum-in

This is what happens when Congress gets involved, and of course, they did it by voice vote.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Oh, that's OK. It's not a real war...it's....it's...well....something else. Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2013 #1
Hit me Blue Owl Sep 2013 #2
That's not accurate alcibiades_mystery Sep 2013 #3
You can snarfle, snuff, nitpick, as you like, but it's accurate - what's the difference between leveymg Sep 2013 #10
He didn't get what he publicly stated he wanted alcibiades_mystery Sep 2013 #12
You mean, he didn't get EVERYTHING he wanted. leveymg Sep 2013 #13
McCain wanted boots on the ground...the resolution forbids it...if that's a nitpick, well alcibiades_mystery Sep 2013 #14
He gets regime change, which is what McCain wanted to begin with. It'll take >90 days to get boots leveymg Sep 2013 #15
OK alcibiades_mystery Sep 2013 #16
Senate Panel Votes To Make Regime Change The Goal Of Syria Mission ProSense Sep 2013 #4
Isn't "reversing the situation on the ground" the same as "getting involved in a civil war?" arcane1 Sep 2013 #9
"Changing the momentum on the ground." Jesus, we are opening a bullwinkle428 Sep 2013 #5
That doesn't sound limited to me. What does it take to change momentum given the totality of Assad dkf Sep 2013 #6
Now Obama will be forced to carry it out against his will. Just like spying on US citizens. The Link Sep 2013 #7
Yeah, sucks that he ends up doing so much stuff he really doesn't want to...nt joeybee12 Sep 2013 #11
Dear God in Heaven, save us from ourselves. n/t Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2013 #8
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»McCrazy voted yes only af...»Reply #4