Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
9. I honestly can't blame you.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 06:17 PM
Sep 2013

Personally, I despise the Assad regime, especially because of their use of WMDs. But, although there are definitely some decent organizations fighting al-Assad....there are, sadly, also Islamists who are trying to take advantage of the situation, especially the Nusra group and AQ.....whom, by the way, may very well be being armed by the BushCo factions of the CIA, amongst others.....

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'm also conflicted BainsBane Sep 2013 #1
I see hawks becoming doves and doves becoming hawks DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2013 #3
It's all about party politics to them. BainsBane Sep 2013 #6
On both sides./nt DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2013 #15
With all due respect, I don't see what the conflict is LibAsHell Sep 2013 #2
Why is punishing an aggressor laughable?/nt DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2013 #4
Who is the aggressor here? MNBrewer Sep 2013 #10
That's a legitimate question DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2013 #13
Well, then, MNBrewer Sep 2013 #16
I would oppose that. DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2013 #19
I don't know this for sure, but I sure do expect it to occur once Assad is gone MNBrewer Sep 2013 #21
And THAT is exactly the point few want to listen to. defacto7 Sep 2013 #28
We invade countries and drop bombs from drones LibAsHell Sep 2013 #25
Right there with you. Oakenshield Sep 2013 #30
+1 Blue_Tires Sep 2013 #5
That is probably my major concern BainsBane Sep 2013 #7
Not that this will matter any, but MNBrewer Sep 2013 #8
Respectfully, I would prefer other methods of crowd control/dispersal DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2013 #11
Doesn't matter MNBrewer Sep 2013 #14
Tear gas and sarin gas are not comparable. n/t pnwmom Sep 2013 #18
SUre they are MNBrewer Sep 2013 #20
Their physical effects are not comparable. Tear gas isn't designed to kill. n/t pnwmom Sep 2013 #24
I honestly can't blame you. AverageJoe90 Sep 2013 #9
People who aren't troubled, who find this situation easy to navigate, well, hats off to 'em alcibiades_mystery Sep 2013 #12
I'm hoping that the UN report might make the right course clearer. pnwmom Sep 2013 #17
Why are chemical weapons the line in the sand? Why is it okay from countries including our own liberal_at_heart Sep 2013 #22
I'm with you d_r Sep 2013 #23
There are other avenues and other people Warpy Sep 2013 #26
Send in a Neville ..... peace in our time .... MindMover Sep 2013 #27
It shouldn't be hard for you to see this belongs in the realm of the UN. dkf Sep 2013 #29
I just don't see what good it willl do. potone Sep 2013 #31
Glad you posted your thoughts BootinUp Sep 2013 #32
I'm not conflicted at all. Marr Sep 2013 #33
Rep. Barbara Lee is voting No Dems to Win Sep 2013 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»As a Democrat and a man o...»Reply #9