General Discussion

whatchamacallit

(15,558 posts)

3. It's what assholes do when they run out of arguments. n/t

Reply to quinnox (Original post)

Thu Sep 5, 2013, 12:52 PM

Sep 2013

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

45 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Do you think it is sound logic that whatever Rand Paul is for, you should be against? [View all] quinnox Sep 2013 OP

nah, it's not logic at all, just moronic as hell. cali Sep 2013 #1

I saw him wearing clothes, so now I always go naked. nt ZombieHorde Sep 2013 #2

PICS! Or this post is worthless! Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2013 #6

I've been refusing to breathe ever since I heard he does. NuclearDem Sep 2013 #12

It's what assholes do when they run out of arguments. n/t whatchamacallit Sep 2013 #3

And yet those same voices find themselves aligned with Rove, Cheney and Rummy. Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2013 #4

Thanks for making my point BEFORE I made it. JoePhilly Sep 2013 #7

No ... now let's hear what Dick Cheney thinks ... and McCain, and Graham too ... JoePhilly Sep 2013 #5

It's an idiotic approach to take n/t Lurks Often Sep 2013 #8

Your argument is facile, because you conflate things that have relevance to the political sphere msanthrope Sep 2013 #9

So what you are suggesting . . . markpkessinger Sep 2013 #24

No--what I'm suggesting is that to put Rand Paul in the same league as John Kerry or President Obama msanthrope Sep 2013 #28

I haven't seen anyone put Rand Paul "in the same league" as the others you mention markpkessinger Sep 2013 #31

Thank you. Skidmore Sep 2013 #32

Well, it should make you think twice, at least. The Pauls are self-important scumbags. nt onehandle Sep 2013 #10

I'd say both sides are equally guilty... brooklynite Sep 2013 #11

I agree. ZombieHorde Sep 2013 #17

Absolutely not. NuclearDem Sep 2013 #13

Follow no man. blkmusclmachine Sep 2013 #14

The enemy of my enemy is still my enemy. Rand Paul is an idiot, but he's a useful one sometimes. Erose999 Sep 2013 #15

Rand Paul is definitely a batshit crazy extremist. Initech Sep 2013 #16

Not sure whether he genuinely believes that shit, or is merely an unprincipled opportunist. n/t winter is coming Sep 2013 #19

No, but it's definitely amusing to see "Rand Paul" and "sound logic" appear in the same sentence. winter is coming Sep 2013 #18

Not necessarily. Now if Sanders and Warren turn out to be for something that Paul is against, pampango Sep 2013 #20

No tkmorris Sep 2013 #21

It's called PDS . . . markpkessinger Sep 2013 #22

It's ABSURD. It's second grade logic. woo me with science Sep 2013 #23

Is it "sound logic" to be opposed to anything Heritage is for? ProSense Sep 2013 #25

no it is not sound logic. liberal_at_heart Sep 2013 #26

ABSOLUTELY YES if you're feeble-minded Blue Owl Sep 2013 #27

well they can't say they are always for whatever Obama is for Skittles Sep 2013 #29

He's for toupees. I'm totally against it. SummerSnow Sep 2013 #30

Same goes for McSame, Boner,Graham, and the other Chickenhawks whom Obama has gone to NightWatcher Sep 2013 #33

D=good, R=bad alc Sep 2013 #34

Of course it isn't, in the real world MNBrewer Sep 2013 #35

No. But neither should "progressives" be promoting him... SidDithers Sep 2013 #36

Here is Obama in Time Magazine waxing promotional of Tom Coburn. Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #42

So, I'll put you down as "OK to promote Rand Paul"... SidDithers Sep 2013 #45

If the Pauls come out in favor of dental hygiene... HooptieWagon Sep 2013 #37

No JustAnotherGen Sep 2013 #38

It is an abstract as hominem. It assumes Paul is always wrong. bemildred Sep 2013 #39

If Rand Paul and Ron Paul disagree on something, does that mean that there is no correct take on it? JVS Sep 2013 #40

Does Rand hate pizza? LiberalAndProud Sep 2013 #41

Only if you're a Marxist deutsey Sep 2013 #43

No, it is just plain stupid to put it mildly and I don't know why it hasn't occurred to them so far sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #44