General Discussion

DevonRex

(22,541 posts)

16. Except when you promoted it on August 28th:

Thu Sep 5, 2013, 02:07 PM

Sep 2013

Star Member David__77 (15,240 posts)
28. Attacking Syria would be worse.
Certainly an impeachable offense, and giving aid and comfort to al Qaeda.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023552966#post28

And even called it treason. Because that's what "giving aid and comfort to the enemy is."

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

45 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hunter: Obama could be impeached if he strikes Syria without authorization [View all] David__77 Sep 2013 OP

Tomorrow's headline: 'Hunter: Obama could be impeached if he doesn't strike Syria' Newsjock Sep 2013 #1

I'll believe it when i see it Hydra Sep 2013 #2

wasn't it for lying under oath? MotherPetrie Sep 2013 #4

Supposedly Hydra Sep 2013 #6

I have nothing but contmpt for Clapper and those who did not hold him to any account for his lies MotherPetrie Sep 2013 #7

About a blow job. Ken Starr couldn't get a DC grand jury to true bill on such a ridiculous msanthrope Sep 2013 #20

Lying is lying. MotherPetrie Sep 2013 #22

Actually, under the law, it is not. nt msanthrope Sep 2013 #23

Call it whatever you want. Doesn't change what he did. MotherPetrie Sep 2013 #24

Got a blowjob? Quel dommage!! nt msanthrope Sep 2013 #29

Are you promoting this idea? DevonRex Sep 2013 #3

I'm promoting news of it being mentioned. David__77 Sep 2013 #8

Except when you promoted it on August 28th: DevonRex Sep 2013 #16

I think launching a war for al Qaeda without authorizationwould be an impeachable offense. David__77 Sep 2013 #18

FFS, we're not talking about a "War for al-Qaeda" Adrahil Sep 2013 #39

It's completely accurate. David__77 Sep 2013 #45

And here you said Obama is fighting on behalf of the heirs of Osama bin Laden: DevonRex Sep 2013 #17

That IS a real threat. Thank you for reposting. David__77 Sep 2013 #19

A negotiated peaceful settlement? Adrahil Sep 2013 #41

Please Mr Fox, whatever you do, don't throw me into that briar patch! eridani Sep 2013 #14

This place may blow up zipplewrath Sep 2013 #25

Hey zip. DevonRex Sep 2013 #30

What a nonsequiture zipplewrath Sep 2013 #31

I haven't come to a conclusion at all. DevonRex Sep 2013 #32

Okay zipplewrath Sep 2013 #33

Total pacifist? Of course not. DevonRex Sep 2013 #36

Who has been reluctant? zipplewrath Sep 2013 #37

I thought from the very beginning that was why he changed his position and took it to Congress Samantha Sep 2013 #5

come on MFM008 Sep 2013 #9

If that happens at least we might get to see the evidence. joshcryer Sep 2013 #10

I seriously doubt that would happen. David__77 Sep 2013 #11

Yeah, you're right. joshcryer Sep 2013 #12

See what pardoning Bush gets you with these people? Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2013 #13

A big reason for republicans in the House to vote No. pampango Sep 2013 #15

Duncan Hunter served in the Marines in Iraq & Afghanistan???? Capt. Obvious Sep 2013 #21

His kid? former9thward Sep 2013 #35

Duncan Hunter - former Presidential candidate did not serve in Iraq and Afghanistan or the Marines Capt. Obvious Sep 2013 #38

His son is the subject of the OP former9thward Sep 2013 #43

And he should be. Eddie Haskell Sep 2013 #26

I've got to agree 1-Old-Man Sep 2013 #34

Hope springs eternal BeyondGeography Sep 2013 #27

no credibility Enrique Sep 2013 #28

They can impeach him if Bo piddles on the rug...(nt) Jeff In Milwaukee Sep 2013 #40

He is just looking for cover, the plan is to impeach no matter what, they have the votes. CK_John Sep 2013 #42

Sure, just like if Obama would face backlash if he burned a bag of kittens on live TV. geek tragedy Sep 2013 #44