General Discussion

Segami

(14,923 posts)

15. BWHAHAHAHA!!

Reply to Hissyspit (Original post)

Thu Sep 5, 2013, 04:14 PM

Sep 2013

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

87 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Poll: Majority Of Americans Approve Of Sending Congress To Syria [View all] Hissyspit Sep 2013 OP

Lol, seems like a good idea along the lines of what I have always felt should be a requirement for sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #1

My first thought too! Rockyj Sep 2013 #39

Because our leaders believe they are an elite class whose lives are way too valuable to be placed at sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #46

I like the idea Jack Rabbit Sep 2013 #63

I like your idea! SammyWinstonJack Sep 2013 #87

The Syrians would probably have a better chance of survival from cruise missles. Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2013 #2

LOL Aerows Sep 2013 #4

LOL leftstreet Sep 2013 #11

I think I would prefer cruise missiles. mountain grammy Sep 2013 #43

Duzy :) nt TBF Sep 2013 #47

Thats not a minus DJ13 Sep 2013 #55

I think Congress' Aerows Sep 2013 #3

Hey, at least explosive diarrhea gets shit done. NuclearDem Sep 2013 #27

Indeed. ChazInAz Sep 2013 #34

LMAO - DUzy! Aerows Sep 2013 #58

Lol. Best idea of the month! ananda Sep 2013 #5

Only if we can be certain chemical weapons WILL be used Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2013 #6

LOL, best line in the article: Aerows Sep 2013 #18

That's priceless! idwiyo Sep 2013 #69

Ha ha ha iandhr Sep 2013 #7

It's a good idea. Let's do it. LiberalAndProud Sep 2013 #8

OK this made me LOL felix_numinous Sep 2013 #9

the public has learned more from the Iraq debacle than the Congress has carolinayellowdog Sep 2013 #10

It's cost us a lot more than it has them. n/t winter is coming Sep 2013 #32

That gets MY support! bvar22 Sep 2013 #12

Good idea but it is prohibited sarisataka Sep 2013 #13

"Subjecting the Syrian population to our Congress surely would fall under that" Jamastiene Sep 2013 #23

... idwiyo Sep 2013 #67

I don;t care who you are that is hilarious Snake Plissken Sep 2013 #14

BWHAHAHAHA!! Segami Sep 2013 #15

Maybe they can get their numbers up in the approval category if they go, they should consider it. Jefferson23 Sep 2013 #16

They can't even get .... AnneD Sep 2013 #82

All that vote yes, and all who support this foolishness nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #17

I'll help them get their luggage on the plane n/t Aerows Sep 2013 #19

Hey, what luggage? They must use a military kit nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #20

Even better! n/t Aerows Sep 2013 #21

+1000 Blue_Tires Sep 2013 #33

If we leave those who vote No, we might have a House that's 80% republican and a senate pampango Sep 2013 #81

The best line is ... Snake Plissken Sep 2013 #22

He should be airdropped in. krispos42 Sep 2013 #26

I always thought it was "hit the ground running" dickthegrouch Sep 2013 #62

*snicker* krispos42 Sep 2013 #24

BWAH! Yup. Count me in as part of the majority! bigwillq Sep 2013 #25

Better yet, their children, if they are of age. DinahMoeHum Sep 2013 #28

If Assad had to negotiate with McCain and McConnell Nevernose Sep 2013 #29

Really! Can't we just send them over there to "talk" to him? mountain grammy Sep 2013 #44

That would cause me to reconsider my position against any strikes. Autumn Sep 2013 #30

I think 90% is a conservative estimate, but yes by all means. nt 99th_Monkey Sep 2013 #31

You Onioned Me. Rain Mcloud Sep 2013 #35

Best idea I've heard all day! Fuddnik Sep 2013 #36

Good idea. Also, send the generals and admirals who currently have desks in the Pentagon. AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2013 #37

We can't POSSIBLY hate the Syrians that much. Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2013 #38

kick kentuck Sep 2013 #40

LMFAO n/t L0oniX Sep 2013 #41

regardless of your stance on syria iamthebandfanman Sep 2013 #42

I'm with the Majority of Americans on this! truebluegreen Sep 2013 #45

“In fact, my preference would have been for Congress to be deployed months ago,” etherealtruth Sep 2013 #48

That's so funny, I logged in just to say "LOL"! SlipperySlope Sep 2013 #49

Wouldn't that constitute a war crime? IDemo Sep 2013 #50

You might get away with it assuming you keep Bush, Cheney & Co in US. idwiyo Sep 2013 #68

Make it so. 99Forever Sep 2013 #51

So would that be considered biological warfare? Incitatus Sep 2013 #52

Only if they tried to procreate while they were there . . . ConcernedCanuk Sep 2013 #86

hehehehehehe Solly Mack Sep 2013 #53

I don't think we can do that. The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2013 #54

No kidding. K&R myrna minx Sep 2013 #56

Oh, man, we're gonna miss The Onion! nt valerief Sep 2013 #57

I love that idea! liberal_at_heart Sep 2013 #59

The one thing worse than having chemical weapons used on you harun Sep 2013 #60

Talk about toxic gas!!!! LOL grahamhgreen Sep 2013 #61

That's the ticket. UtahLib Sep 2013 #64

I don't think we could afford the expense account tab. tavernier Sep 2013 #65

Haven't they suffered enough? Spirochete Sep 2013 #66

Speaking as a Canadian arikara Sep 2013 #70

Syria would probably prefer getting hit with cruise missiles than having the US Congress land there Snake Plissken Sep 2013 #71

The horror! That would be a war crime of immense proportions! n/t malthaussen Sep 2013 #72

For a moment there... Enthusiast Sep 2013 #73

Funniest poll in 10 years /nt golfguru Sep 2013 #74

But only those who vote in favor of military action. gtar100 Sep 2013 #75

K&R Rebellious Republican Sep 2013 #76

Will make John Mccain and Lindsey Graham generals. B Calm Sep 2013 #77

Send the Congress and their families, regardless of age fadedrose Sep 2013 #78

thanks for that florida08 Sep 2013 #79

At Last!!!!!!!! AnneD Sep 2013 #80

Right on! Time to put some Birkenstocks on the ground! KansDem Sep 2013 #83

Yes please! nt bluedeathray Sep 2013 #84

Send the WH, too. blkmusclmachine Sep 2013 #85